User talk:66.162.17.163

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.


April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George de Mestral, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: George de Mestral was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-14T15:20:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The recent edit you made to George de Mestral constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to George de Mestral. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 15:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to George de Mestral. J.delanoygabsadds 15:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.
--Bhadani (talk) 15:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Four Deuces, you will be blocked from editing. CredoFromStart talk 19:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Logie Baird, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Badgernet (talk) 15:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
The recent edit you made to Netherlands constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αlεx•mullεr 19:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mississippi River, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ERobson (talk) 16:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mississippi River. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ERobson (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gneiss has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Pyrite constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. LeaveSleaves (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Joseph Black has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —ossmanntalk 16:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Joseph Black constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —ossmanntalk 16:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Abortion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —ossmanntalk 14:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Abortion constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Thingg⊕⊗ 14:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to William B. Campbell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Isham G. Harris constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ignatius of Antioch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 14:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ignatius of Antioch constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 14:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Christian Brothers High School (Memphis, Tennessee) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 20:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ralph Abernathy worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Versus22 talk 19:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sigismund III Vasa has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bexample\.com (links: http://www.example.com).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page File:Roman Empire 125.svg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 19:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ballet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 18:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Ballet. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 18:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Palo Alto, California has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 18:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Castle, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BarretBonden (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Macclesfield Castle, you will be blocked from editing. --Wetman (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page John the Baptist has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps Talk • Contribs 14:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oct 2009 again[edit]

Stop vandalism, or be blocked. Twice on Michael (archangel) today. This IP needs a block. History2007 (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page John the Baptist. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Rrburke(talk) 14:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you post improperly-placed jokes on Wikipedia, as you did to John the Baptist, you will be blocked from editing. TheSavageNorwegian 14:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Maximilian Kolbe worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. ♃ Dr. Yuriev 18:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mary (mother of Jesus). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. NellieBly (talk) 18:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ignatius of Loyola. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mississippi worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. DCEdwards1966 19:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to History of Sparta. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Second Battle of Bull Run, you will be blocked from editing. ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 15:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Union. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 15:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Theodore M. Davis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Karenjc 19:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Welfare, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JForget 16:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Bicycle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  – iridescent 18:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Bicycle. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  – iridescent 18:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with your recent edit to Bicycle, you will be blocked from editing.

Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Consistent life ethic, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Stop This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did with your edit to History of the rosary, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 19:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Early life of Pope Benedict XVI has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Early life of Pope Benedict XVI constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Ross (Cherokee chief), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Ross (Cherokee chief) was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959405 on 2010-11-22T17:24:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Rise of Christianity, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Rise of Christianity was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921279 on 2011-01-27T19:01:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cumulonimbus cloud, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cumulonimbus cloud was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975408 on 2011-02-01T15:51:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Rise of Christianity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LovesMacs (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mildred D. Taylor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mildred D. Taylor was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950144 on 2011-03-11T17:10:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Our Lady of Fátima, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Minima© (talk) 19:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William Paca, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: William Paca was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861022 on 2011-05-04T14:24:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to William Paca. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 14:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Paca with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 14:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chicano. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chicano was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855042 on 2011-05-04T19:00:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Adams, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Adams was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971254 on 2011-05-09T20:55:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Paca with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  20:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Third Amendment to the United States Constitution, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Electorate of Brunswick-Lüneburg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Wikipelli. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Whig Party (United States) with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wikipelli Talk 14:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Whig Party (United States) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 14:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oh Do Kwan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oh Do Kwan was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-10-03T18:53:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Fairly OddParents, you may be blocked from editing. Cutecutecuteface2000 (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dominic Savio, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Fluffernutter. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Elon J. Farnsworth with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Microsoft PowerPoint, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Microsoft PowerPoint was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.990305 on 2012-02-24T17:43:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saint Stephen, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saint Stephen was changed by 66.162.17.163 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870146 on 2012-03-06T20:07:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Absentee ballot, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robot. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jprg1966 (talk) 19:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pegasus with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (t) Josve05a (c) 16:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Public university, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Elmwood Cemetery (Memphis, Tennessee) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saint Cecilia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mojoworker (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Christmas in the American Civil War— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christmas in the American Civil War with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Christmas in the American Civil War with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Tutelary. An edit you recently made to The Carnival of the Animals seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stick (comics)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 15:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Audrey Hepburn has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:66.162.17.163&oldid=1141668562"