User talk:67.173.182.93

Ban appeal.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.173.182.93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not a Reference Desk troll. I was posting a sincere question, and now I can't reply. So I disagree that I was not making constructive edits. 67.173.182.93 (talk) 13:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC).

Decline reason:

Not blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

67.173.182.93 (talk) 13:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm still blocked on the Science Desk. I previous tried the appeal last night in the https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/public/appeal/view page, but not it says page expired. My Wikipedia appeal key is 1b123c81670a691e809b6c001cb9b7f3118c77d6b378938228aa6cb64b5b9c6b6c6bb3c3935a552dd9809fbc93cfb29b4727607e057ae3257a8694eddef8f5cc 67.173.182.93 (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC).

Update, okay thanks, it now works. 67.173.182.93 (talk) 02:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC).

Damn, just posted 3 things in the Reference Desk, and when I wanted to post a 4th question, boom, have a weird ban. But it's not the type of ban that shows up on my talk page. Weird. 67.173.182.93 (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC).

---