User talk:67.71.37.61

November 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paramount Fine Foods Centre, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Diane Bellemare, you may be blocked from editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@The Herald: What precisely was disruptive about my edit, which I provided an edit summary for? The statement I removed had to do with salary and benefits that all Canadian senators get so it is more appropriately mentioned at Senate of Canada than on the page for an individual senator. My personal opposition to the appointed Senate (and the Conservative Party which Ms. Bellemare is a supporter of) aside, the mentioning of her salary seems to be unnecessary in an article that is supposed to be about her biography. It just sounds like another editor felt it deserved undue weight either because they dislike her, the Senate, or for a similar reason. 67.71.37.61 (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article cited for those statements also makes no mention of Bellemare, it is a generic article about entitlements of Senators that came to public attention during the Duffy trial. 67.71.37.61 (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I know we are generally not supposed to comment on other editors, but the contributions by Cornellier (the editor that added that content) seem to suggest that they have a political axe to grind. They made multiple edits that removed content cited to archived web pages (claiming "get better sources guys") and added this stuff about entitlements into the first sentence of articles. See their edit history at Raynell Andreychuk and Linda Frum. 67.71.37.61 (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.