User talk:69.74.19.226/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

November 2005

  1. This message is regarding the page Salt. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Alf melmac 13:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  2. This is your second warning, mate, and you won't be warned again. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia – whether it's Salt, or Guillotine, or some other page – you will be blocked. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- GraemeL (talk) 15:46, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  4. This message is regarding the page Guillotine. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Alf melmac 13:07, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

December 2005

  1. Vandalism on page 311 (band). See here. 17:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you! novacatz 16:13, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  3. This message is regarding the page Russia. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 16:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  4. I see you've vandalised Russia once more. I believe that you are the same user who has been warned several times over the past few weeks for vandalism; this, and your reaction to Abe's notice, lead me to think you don't really need another warning. Your block expires in 12 hours. You're welcome to return once your time is up, provided you're willing to start making worthwhile contributions. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

January 2006

  1. Please do not add useless points here, Ok. You may be blocked from editing, and all will suffer for your mistake. --Bhadani 13:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 19:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 19:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
    You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Please do not vandalise this page. To do so will see this page protected from all editing. [[Sam Korn]] 13:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Regarding the page Victorian era, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 14:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  6. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Liamdaly620 17:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  7. Regarding the page Wyckoff, New Jersey, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 17:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  8. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 16:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  9. Regarding this edit to the Ramapo High School article: Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Hall Monitor 17:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  10. Regarding this edit to the Ramapo High School article: Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hall Monitor 17:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
    You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 21 days. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Hall Monitor 17:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

March 2006

  1. You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.
    RexNL 17:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

April 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mexoci, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. AzaToth 13:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Aude (talk | contribs) 13:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Aude (talk | contribs) 13:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. —Encephalon 17:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

May 2006

Your recent edit to Battle of the Bulge was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Victorian era. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Computerjoe's talk 15:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bill 15:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for vandalising Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Wikibofh(talk) 15:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I did not do anything to those aritcles! I haven't been to Wikipedia for weeks! [block]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Civil rights on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Phaedriel tell me - 18:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Malcolm X, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Uucp 18:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

September 2006

Your recent edit to Minos (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Guinnog 14:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Singapore, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger22 12:35, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to United Kingdom, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 13:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Luna Santin 15:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Asteriontalk 17:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Asteriontalk 17:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Why doesn't someone block this guy forever? All he/she does is vandalize wikipedia. --Jowan2005

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to St. Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 18:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

--Nishkid64 18:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

October 2006

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wyckoff, New Jersey, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alansohn 21:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. If this is a shared IP (for example, belonging to a school), please provide information on the school's address, and the block will be converted into a soft block. --Nlu (talk) 17:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

January 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Monsey, New York, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Avi 20:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ST47Talk 19:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

You have vandalized Midi-chlorians in what appears to be a pathetic attempt at humor. I would encourage you to try again, but upon second thought, please don't. Find an older sibling and encourage them to make constructive edits. V-Man737 21:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Attention:
With your recent edit to Snood (video game), you have returned to vandalising Wikipedia after being blocked from editing either once or more times. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia, for an extended period of time. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 17:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}.

Ian Cairns 14:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


September 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Jainism, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 18:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Block.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 year as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. · AndonicO Talk 15:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)