Jump to content

User talk:77.99.156.72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Honania
Temporal range: Wuchiapingian, 259–254 Ma
↓
Maxilla, seen from two angles
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Chordata
Class:
Sauropsida
Subclass:
Anapsida
Order:
†Procolophonia
Family:
†Pareiasauridae
Genus:
†Honania

Young, 1979
Binomial name
†Honania complicidentata
Young, 1979
Synonyms
  • Tsiyuania simplicidentata Young, 1979

Honania is a dubious genus of pareiasaur, discovered in China. It was originally synonymized with Shihtienfenia permica, but according to X Li et al. 2014, Honania was a valid genus.[1] It is known from cranial and postcranial remains.

References[edit]

  1. ^ X. Li, X.-W. Li, S.-H. Jia and J. Liu. 2014. The Jiyuan tetrapod Fauna of the Upper Permian of China—1. New pareiasaur material and the reestablishment of Honania complicidentata. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica [R. Butler/R. Butler]


Stub icon

This article about a Permian reptile is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.


Your submission at Articles for creation: Ancistronychus has been accepted[edit]

Ancistronychus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 20:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acuetzpalin has been accepted[edit]

Acuetzpalin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wapitisaurus has been accepted[edit]

Wapitisaurus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sorthat Formation (February 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
To be an article, this needs a reference or two about the actual geology.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 77.99.156.72! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mouaka-Ouadda Formation has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mouaka-Ouadda Formation. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 06:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mouaka-Ouadda Formation (February 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Add more references and categories, and the article will be ready for acceptance.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Sagotreespirit (talk) 15:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rarosaurus has been accepted[edit]

Rarosaurus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Sagotreespirit (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harranasaurus has been accepted[edit]

Harranasaurus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Sagotreespirit (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gunakadeit (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Gunakadeit instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is more complete than the article. The article should be expanded from this draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Platanavis has been accepted[edit]

Platanavis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lutraeximia has been accepted[edit]

Lutraeximia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apatorhamphus has been accepted[edit]

Apatorhamphus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antarcticavis has been accepted[edit]

Antarcticavis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sphaerodontes has been accepted[edit]

Sphaerodontes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:20, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lobothyris (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You need to contextualize this for those that aren't trained biologists.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 02:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bandringa has been accepted[edit]

Bandringa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pachygonosaurus has been accepted[edit]

Pachygonosaurus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:36, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luchibang has been accepted[edit]

Luchibang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afrotapejara has been accepted[edit]

Afrotapejara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- RoySmith (talk) 17:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Panpudding Hill moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Panpudding Hill, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 02:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Panpudding Hill has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Panpudding Hill. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panpudding Hill has been accepted[edit]

Panpudding Hill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Killarnee. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Tienshanosaurus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 21:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

AfC notification: Draft:Mongolarachne chaoyangensis has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mongolarachne chaoyangensis. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mongolarachne chaoyangensis has been accepted[edit]

Mongolarachne chaoyangensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Cap formation[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Mount Cap formation a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Mount Cap Formation. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Titanognathus, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anomodon snyderi has been accepted[edit]

Anomodon snyderi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Indosinian II Unconformity has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Indosinian II Unconformity. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Indosinian I Unconformity has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Indosinian I Unconformity. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mid-Carboniferous unconformity has been accepted[edit]

Mid-Carboniferous unconformity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portland Sand Formation has been accepted[edit]

Portland Sand Formation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello 77.99.156.72, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Draft:Roxby Hall have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2020[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Old Tom Parr, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roxby Hall has been accepted[edit]

Roxby Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roxby Formation has been accepted[edit]

Roxby Formation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kwaaman State (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Em-mustapha talk 11:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bocaconodon has been accepted[edit]

Bocaconodon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takatika Grit (July 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lapablo (talk) 16:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Takatika Grit theropod has been accepted[edit]

Takatika Grit theropod, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 11:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paleocene ammonites has been accepted[edit]

Paleocene ammonites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 12:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coeloptychium has been accepted[edit]

Coeloptychium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 12:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Protochirotherium has been accepted[edit]

Protochirotherium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 15:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Takatika Grit theropod for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Takatika Grit theropod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takatika Grit theropod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otumfuo Nana Twum (July 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Em-mustapha talk 15:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indosinian II Unconformity (August 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Otr500 were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
An article so short, even a stub-class, as to necessitate leaving the article to follows the links for some understanding, is too short. In this case, if there cannot be improvements, such a short dictionary like entry might be better served at Khorat Plateau and a redirect.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Otr500 (talk) 04:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Indosinian I Unconformity has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Indosinian I Unconformity. Thanks! Otr500 (talk) 04:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trigonellites has been accepted[edit]

Trigonellites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indosinian I Unconformity (September 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Declining as per Otr500. There is insufficient sourcing for wikipedia editors to determine if this subject meets our notability guidelines. --Salimfadhley (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Salimfadhley (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Billafunda (Siddha) Sayadaw U. Kowida (September 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Nightenbelle was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a fringe theory at best- needs multiple reliable secondary sources to prove notability.
Nightenbelle (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Indosinian II Unconformity[edit]

Information icon Hello, 77.99.156.72. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Indosinian II Unconformity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Indosinian I Unconformity[edit]

Information icon Hello, 77.99.156.72. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Indosinian I Unconformity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 21:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kwaaman State[edit]

Information icon Hello, 77.99.156.72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kwaaman State, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Billafunda (Siddha) Sayadaw U. Kowida[edit]

Information icon Hello, 77.99.156.72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Billafunda (Siddha) Sayadaw U. Kowida, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Otumfuo Nana Twum[edit]

Information icon Hello, 77.99.156.72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Otumfuo Nana Twum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kwaaman State[edit]

Hello, 77.99.156.72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kwaaman State".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Billafunda (Siddha) Sayadaw U. Kowida[edit]

Hello, 77.99.156.72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Billafunda (Siddha) Sayadaw U. Kowida".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indosinian II Unconformity[edit]

Hello, 77.99.156.72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indosinian II Unconformity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Otumfuo Nana Twum[edit]

Hello, 77.99.156.72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Otumfuo Nana Twum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:77.99.156.72&oldid=1097703899"