User talk:777desha777

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 777desha777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 20:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi, I am wondering if you can give me some tips. I'm confused by the "talk" pages, not sure what to do with my personal page, and how much to put there... I'm also interested in doing a branch off page from Rambam Health Care Campus focusing only on its history. I'd also like to understand what I can and cannot reference better, and how much. The Help is rather overwhelming. I have the big picture. Its the nuances I am interested in. Many thanks.

777desha777 (talk) 09:50, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 777desha777; welcome to Wikipedia. As briefly as possible, here are the answers to your questions...

Article talkpages are for discussing articles (not the subjects of articles): what information should be included, how thing should be worded, whether certain sources are appropriate and so on. They are also used for resolving disputes; if two editors disagree about an article, the talkpage is usually the first place fro them to try and iron out their differences. User talkpages, like this one, are for communicating directly with individual users, to let them know about events or discussions that they may be interested in or to show appreciation for their efforts. More information here.
Your userpage (User:777desha777) is for you to provide information relating to your work on Wikipedia - there's a fair amount of leeway over what you can include, but see this section of the userpage policy for a simple overview of what can be included. You aren't obliged to put anything there, however.
You would need a fairly substantial amount of additional information to warrant a spin-off article on the history of Rambam Health Care Campus; I would suggest that you add what you have to the History section of that page and then propose a split (I can help you with that, just ask) if the section seems to then be too unwieldy.
You can find a list of pages which need better references at this page; when I checked there were over 200,000 entries so you're spoiled for choice... If you need help with referencing, this short essay may help. As far as how much goes, more references (as long as they are to reliable sources are almost invariably a Good Thing!

I hope that helps a bit. If you need specific assistance with anything, I recommend visiting the Teahouse, which is a friendly venue for newer editors to ask questions. You're also welcome to contact me on my talkpage at any time. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:777desha777/Rafael Beyar has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rafael Beyar, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 14:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On the review of the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rafael Beyar[edit]

Hi User:777desha777 ! Well the reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is an appropriate source for that content. In general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article. In the case of your article, you only had two sources on your article, which was even only a passing mention. There should be several articles that a focused on the subject of your article. I realized you have made some improvements on the article and added one more source. If you can, you should attach more sources which are more focused on your subject so that his notability can be verified. Then you should be able to have your article accepted! Hope that helped! You can go to Wikipedia:RS or Wikipedia:V for more information.

ArisaMTC (talk) 18:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rafael Beyar.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! BO | Talk 03:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, 777desha777. You have new messages at OrenBochman's talk page.
Message added 16:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

BO | Talk 16:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(dropping by) please do make some of the improvements specified, and the article will be accepted--it's mainly a question of removing adjectives, and making absolutely certain nothing is copied from a web page or elsewhere. DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rafael Beyar concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rafael Beyar, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Rafael Beyar was accepted[edit]

Rafael Beyar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk) 11:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal was accepted[edit]

Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gigs (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Silbermann has been accepted[edit]

Michael Silbermann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:30, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Michael Silbermann, DMD, PhD.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Silbermann, DMD, PhD.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Michael Silbermann, DMD, PhD.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Michael Silbermann, DMD, PhD.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, 777desha777. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, 777desha777. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, 777desha777. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]