User talk:79.70.179.144

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nicholas Wade[edit]

Take it to the talk page, this has been discussed there!--Milowenthasspoken 19:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 79.70.179.144! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Do you know about the advantages of getting a free account?

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits. If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (79.70.179.144) is used to identify you instead.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 205.154.245.36 (talk) 22:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Edit warring is disruptive no matter how many reverts there are, so what you need to do is get consensus for your changes via discussion. Simply posting a comment on a talk page does not mean that a consensus has been achieved, especially if nobody has had time to answer to you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Allergens[edit]

FYI, allergens are not a type of infection. Two totally different things. An allergen stimulates an immune response without infecting or replicating. — Shibbolethink ( ) 15:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. I think we need a separate page on Bio-incidents which would cover allergic and toxic incidents. Would you like to go ahead and create one? 79.70.179.144 (talk) 21:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe that would be a notable article as separate from the current article. Allergen contaminations in and of themselves, if they are notable, would likely be DUE for the article which already exists. I do not believe allergen contamination or unsubstantiated "suspected" incidents are particularly due for inclusion in any article, given that these incidents happen every day, all the time, without any negative repercussions whatsoever. It would be like reporting every incident of a computer virus getting into a company. It becomes a laundry list. — Shibbolethink ( ) 15:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nicholas Wade. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 00:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since when does warring apply to inserting tags when other editors are in disagreement? 79.70.173.174 (talk) 00:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]