User talk:82.84.225.97

Sbucciami moved to draftspace[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sbucciami. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 17:39, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sbucciami (October 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sbucciami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 82.84.225.97! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Phuzion (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Excuse me, could you please explain me why was it rejected? I added sources, including books with a part about the song... Does it need more sources? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bardcore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bardcore, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 16:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now "Genius" appears not to be reliable? I mean, let's get straight to the point: I've written the musician has released some songs in old languages. I added two links certifying he actually has. What more is required? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A user-submitted unreviewed "bio" on genius is not a reliable source. The blog is not a reliable source. There appears to be no independent, reliable sources that give any significance to Khole, and no reason to mention him in the article. Stop trying to promote him on Wikipedia. Schazjmd (talk) 16:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I ain't promoting anyone, just adding an info about a musician who does a quite uncommon thing such as singing in those languages. Ah, I added an article from a newspaper mentioning him, that should be counting as reliable, doesn't it? Be please so kind as to revert your edit 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A brief mention is insufficient. That article name drops many Bardcore performers. There is no encyclopedic purpose to mentioning them all and no reason to single out Khole. Schazjmd (talk) 16:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All of them sing in Middle Scots and Old French? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you find an independent source that discusses Khole to the extent that your straitstimes ref discussed Yong, it might be worth mentioning. Schazjmd (talk) 16:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ye know what? Do as you want, tantu è predda lampadda i' lu pozzu, as we say around my native place. ;) 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mo-Do, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's from the Italian article 82.84.225.97 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song) (October 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a chart-topping single, does it really need more? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song). Thanks! Qcne (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for telling me! Could you please do that for me? Thank you! 82.84.225.97 (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song) (November 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please convert your external links to references. See WP:INTREFVE and WP:EXTERNAL for guidelines. At this point the draft is not properly verifiable without having to dig through external links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poetica (song) (November 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

That's a bit better than last time, but we still need more and better sourcing, especially for the "Personnel" section, and more information about the creative process of the song (which should be easy to find). Try taking a look at WP:SONGS to see how you can improve the draft as a whole.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poetica (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 15:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Destri (song) (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significant, independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Destri (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song) has been accepted[edit]

Tell Me Why (Prezioso & Marvin song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Shadow311. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Erica De Matteis, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Shadow311 (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Connected (Stereo MC's song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding sources. BTW: You can link the article Rockol in the citation. Also, please add a "|access-date=" parameter? If the page goes 404, it helps locating it in an archive such as Wayback Machine – https://archive.org. You could add the Wayback Machine archive with "|archive-link=" and "archive-date=". BTW: Sometimes there is a problem with the archive-date being different from the archive link date. You if it is flagged as an error, derive the correct date from the archive-url. Thank again! Cheers ~~

You're welcome, and thanks for being kind! I appreciate that :) Cheers mate!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at La rondine (song). - FlightTime (open channel) 16:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wave Goodbye (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources. External links are not considered but in this case none are reliable sources so not useful for references. See also the notability guidelines for songs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wave Goodbye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wave Goodbye (February 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wave Goodbye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at '74–'75. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 16:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Like I Can. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 17:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 18:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Something for the Weekend (Ben Westbeech song) (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Something for the Weekend (Ben Westbeech song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 20:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Dying of the Light (song)[edit]

The article The Dying of the Light (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article does not satisfy WP:NSONG: there is just one source that simply mentions the title. Neither multiple, nor detailed sources are provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Викидим (talk) 05:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quelli che benpensano (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Geardona were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article needs more secondary sources to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quelli che benpensano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 12:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a multi-platinum song, very popular and covered a lot of times. What more do you need? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What we need is SECONDARY SOURCES, which you have been told a dozen times already on this very talk page. I have half a mind of simply blocking you for wasting the time of so many reviewers. Pinging User:Geardona, User:KylieTastic, User:Phuzion, User:ScottishFinnishRadish, User:Schazjmd (indeed, Genius has NEVER been a reliable source), User:Materialscientist (who'll confirm that Wikipedia, not even the Italian Wikipedia, is a source for Wikipedia), User:Idoghor Melody, User:Qcne, User:Hey man im josh, User:Oltrepier, User:WikiOriginal-9, User:Shadow311, User:FlightTime, User:S0091, User:ResolutionsPerMinute--and now I'm running out of breath, but these have all have uttered similar concerns. Drmies (talk) 17:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at that list, you have been told what you need to do, instead of complaining about it you should find (secondary, reliable and independent) sources. Doing that is way better for all of us. Geardona (talk to me?) 20:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six months worth of reminders and warnings...I don't think they're interested in learning how to do it right. Schazjmd (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Poetica (song) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Poetica (song). Thanks! Drmies (talk) 17:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sbucciami (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG at this point in time. Has issues with neutrality and sourcing as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sbucciami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waking Up (2018 song) (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG in it's current state. Also has issues with neutrality.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waking Up (2018 song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Destri (song)[edit]

Hello, 82.84.225.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Destri (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Something for the Weekend (Ben Westbeech song) (April 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to pass WP:NSONG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Something for the Weekend (Ben Westbeech song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 18:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Waking Up (MJ Cole and Freya Ridings song) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Waking Up (MJ Cole and Freya Ridings song). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sbucciami (April 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No change since last decline. Before resubmitting read WP:NSONG and improve the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sbucciami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@T.C.G. [talk] 23:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poetica (song) (April 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Geardona was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Rephrase stuff like “ and contains a very important message” to be more NPOV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poetica (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 10:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just did it and resubmitted draft 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Gold (Spandau Ballet song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Spirito. Binksternet (talk) 17:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gothic rock. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.