User talk:83.98.229.18

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy, such as a VPN service. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you are using an open proxy or VPN service, you will need to disable it or turn it off in order to edit Wikipedia.

If you believe you are not using an anonymizing proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the Unblock Ticket Request System.

More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). For more information, see the WikiProject on Open Proxies.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using an open or anonymizing proxies in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

August 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 11:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 11:57, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

83.98.229.18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all. I was not editing an article so the block cannot be given for disruptive editing. I was only triing to give notice on the discussion page that certain statements given on the article page about "White genocide conspiracy theory" lacked proper sources and that even arguments could be made to the contrary. Thus hoping this that those who wrote the article or that moderators would critically have a look at it, and in a reply give me arguments for their dissusion about it. However, somehow Acroterion did not seem to think it neccesary to take my contribution seriously and even removed it from the discussion page . Sending me the message that: "talk pages such as Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings." I found this strange and rude, since my remarks where on topic and pure meant to help improvement of the article. I know how sensitive these type off articles are so I allready purposly had chosen not to make improvements myself but in contrary would tried to convince people in an open discussion and exchange of arguments. It seemed to me that especcially this type of articles should be well balanced and well sourced. I believed I had a legitemative remark to improve the article on both points. At least it deserved a serious answer in an open discussion on the discussion page. So I tried it again, now with extra prove off my points, and again Acroterion removed it without responding in a serious open discussion on arguments. I experienced this as disruptive editing by him, not by me. To make my point I did some extra edits on the discussion page. Same happened. Mind you, I never ever even promoted white genocide consperacy theory in my comments, I only confronted Acroterion with facts. I cannot help it that those facts should lead to corrections, read more balanced nuanced and well sourced statements, in the article and that Acroterion does not like this (And who says I like it, I just believe Wikipedia should hold ups its policy towards the truth, regardless the outcome). But it does not give him the right to deny me a proper discussion on the topic, let alone to block me.83.98.229.18 (talk) 12:36, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Quote: "when I plot a timeline with the various "races" and their number of living members on this planet, then it shows clearly a race to the bottom for the white "race"" No thanks. Block upheld, WP:NONAZIS. Yamla (talk) 12:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.