User talk:84.208.233.159

March 2019

Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fern, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plantsurfer 00:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Science daily is not a reliable source? Look serious enough for me. (And at least it was a source. There are plenty of content in the same section that ends with "citation needed", which are not deleted.)84.208.233.159 (talk) 00:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Spider-Man:_Into_the_Spider-Verse

[1] Nice work. -- 109.78.227.196 (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. You welcome. 84.208.233.159 (talk) 19:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ctenophora. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It's an encyclopedia. Please use WP:SCIRS reviews. Zefr (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop treating my like I'm a vandal, I'm doing everything by the book as far as I know. 84.208.233.159 (talk) 23:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

It's not about vandalism, it's about choosing high-quality reviews where other experts have confirmed the observations you're using with primary sources. This edit points to something unusual, but the sources are unconfirmed and not published under peer-review, as described in WP:SCIASSESS. --Zefr (talk) 23:36, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

---