User talk:86.134.4.222

October 2012

Hello, I'm Gilderien. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Louis Theroux, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Theroux with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC

I replied on my talk page.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Theroux. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Louis Theroux was changed by 86.134.4.222 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941953 on 2012-10-11T23:03:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:03, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 86.134.4.222. You have new messages at Gilderien's talk page.
Message added 16:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 16:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

And again.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

And again. Btw, you should create an account, it makes you more anonymous and means you can carry on with conversations even if your IP address changes (which it probably will).--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Theroux, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Louis Theroux was changed by 86.134.4.222 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963254 on 2012-10-13T20:20:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Louis Theroux. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Reply to your message

Do you have any proof that he was a sexual predator? You'll need reliable sources if you want to add new information to a biography of a living person. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Louis Theroux. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.134.4.222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Blocked by some person who seems to believe I was vandalising, instead of having my researched and referenced edits removed inappropriately86.134.4.222 (talk) 20:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you reread your block notice, you will see that you were (correctly) blocked for edit warring, not vandalism. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 23:56, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---