User talk:90.241.160.140

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanzhi language (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Crunchydillpickle was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanzhi language and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 18:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 90.241.160.140! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 18:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Esh

Your contribution to esh may well be valid but you deleted existing material without explanation (which is why I reverted your edit) and you also made unexplained additions.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 13:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sekai’s Blog (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sekai’s Blog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 18:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sekai’s Blog has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sekai’s Blog. Thanks! microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 18:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit summary

The edit summary is meant to provide a brief description of the nature and purpose of each edit. Please do not add long essays or copy articles into the edit summary. Spam edit summaries will be hidden from the page histories. Certes (talk) 18:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

What do you mean? 90.241.160.140 (talk) 19:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

I refer to edits such as this, where the summary has nothing to do with the edit and is not in English. Certes (talk) 19:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanzhi language (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanzhi language and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 20:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sekai’s Blog (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sekai’s Blog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sekai’s Blog has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sekai’s Blog. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

U

Please read WP:Bold, revert, discuss. Yes, you may wp:Be bold and make a change without prior agreement BUT your change can be reverted and you are asked to justify it at the talk page. Which is what I did. And will now do again so please use the talk page. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Unsourced and improperly summarized edits

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In addition, many edits of yours have an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

As you have not responded to earlier requests to explain your changes, they are all being reverted until you do. At this stage, you will need to go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics#Unsourced edits if you believe that they are valid and well-founded. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to O. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ~With regards, I followed The Username Policy (Message Me) (What I have done on Wikipedia) 15:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Smash or pass https://web.archive.org/web/20121102023045/http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/029/8/f/eiko_flying_on_a_pencil_by_sekaisblog-d4nzijc.jpg 90.241.160.140 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 1 week for persistent addition of unsourced information.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Wug·a·po·des 02:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.241.160.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was posting unsourced Info, i am very sorry and will not do it again, I was also posting false information without any citations and even when there were citations they weren’t reliable.90.241.160.140 (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Thank you for admitting you deliberately intended to disrupt Wikipedia. That means the block is necessary. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

90.241.160.140 (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.241.160.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was posting unsourced Info, i am very sorry and will not do it again.90.241.160.140 (talk) 20:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address your introducing false information. Yamla (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Panian513 16:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sekai’s Blog (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sekai’s Blog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.241.160.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was adding unsourced edits and some of my edits had a inappropriate edit summary. 90.241.160.140 (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Looks like a good block, then. Yamla (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please describe what you would do instead. Please describe what constructive edits you would make.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.241.160.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was adding unsourced edits and some of my edits had a inappropriate edit summary. I am very sorry and will not do it again. 90.241.160.140 (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I need more than a slight rephrasing of yesterday's request Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

90.241.160.140 (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.241.160.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was adding unsourced edits and some of my edits had a inappropriate edit summary. I am very sorry and will not do it again. I only intended to make contructive edits and also smash or pass https://web.archive.org/web/20121102023045/http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/029/8/f/eiko_flying_on_a_pencil_by_sekaisblog-d4nzijc.jpg 90.241.160.140 (talk) 2:12 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.241.160.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was adding unsourced edits and some of my edits had a inappropriate edit summary. I am very sorry and will not do it again. I only intended to make contructive edits and also if you actually did the research to see what I meant in my edits I would forgive you! 90.241.160.140 (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This doesn't tell us what you will do instead of making inappropriate edits. We need at least one specific example. 331dot (talk) 13:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

90.241.160.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was adding unsourced edits and some of my edits had a inappropriate edit summary. I am very sorry and will not do it again. I only intended to make contructive edits and also if you actually did the research you will find out that all my edits are true ALSO I think you have misunderstood me the whole time AANND I even had to protest at the simple English Wikipedia https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/90.241.160.140 90.241.160.140 (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below, and based on Yamla's tone and the amount of requests you've made in the last week since being blocked for a month, it's time to revoke your talk page access so you no longer waste our time or yours (well, you can still make private requests). Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

90.241.160.140 (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

This is now your seventh unblock request. Yet again, you have refused to provide "at least one specific example" of an edit you plan to make. Your unblock request is almost certainly going to be declined as well and, most likely, you will lose talk page access and your block may even be extended. Are you absolutely sure you want this unblock request to be reviewed? If not, I very strongly urge you to remove your open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 07:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

I have increased the block length, as another IP address has been used to evade the block on this IP address. JBW (talk) 21:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

---