User talk:96.81.123.61

December 2020[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 19:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this was a consensus on thelead.96.81.123.61 (talk) 16:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Important notices[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Paris Agreement have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paris Agreement was changed by 96.81.123.61 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953806 on 2021-02-07T11:56:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sangdeboeuf. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Potts (Doctor Who). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bill Potts (Doctor Who) was changed by 96.81.123.61 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853885 on 2021-02-07T15:59:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2021[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to United Nations Human Rights Council—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn talk 16:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to United Nations Human Rights Council. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Sundown if you check the talk pages, consensus was reached. please restore my editing

January 2022[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.81.123.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not do a disruptive edit. I edited an entry that had reach consensus----

Decline reason:

Nonsense. Yamla (talk) 16:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla check the talk page everyone was in agreement, no one disagreed.96.81.123.61 (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I removed a BLP violation here. We insist on much better sources for such inflammatory claims. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What makes a respected Israeli source, the Tlaib's family ties to terrorism andRashida Tlaib anti Semitis is an established fact.96.81.123.61 (talk)

Don't use such activist sites, especially for such claims. Read WP:BLP. Your article edit was removed. That should be a cue for you to not move it to the talk page. This isn't an ordinary dispute over normal content. It's a BLP matter, and we're very careful about such matters. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind that criticism of Israeli abuses against Palestinians is not anti-semitism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only abuse is for the racism towards Jews by Palestinian terrorist supporters.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

96.81.123.61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I put a post on a talk page stating the point that Israel's capital is Jerusalem I use a respected publication and now I am being blocked.

Decline reason:

That's not the post you were blocked for, and you know it. I see no pathway forward here without an agreement to not edit about Rep. Talib and the Arab-Israeli conflict. 331dot (talk) 18:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So despite Wikipedia guarantee of free editing you want to restrict mine because I piosed facts about the terrorist Tlaib family and counter the pro terrorist admins of wikipedia.96.81.123.61 (talk) 13:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) {{Unbklock| I am being blocked by an adminstrator who objects to my constructive edits on the Arab-Israeli conflict.96.81.123.61 (talk) 13:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not, and never has made a guarantee of "free editing." All editors and their edits are required to conform to the various Wikipedia rules and policies, and this has been the case since day 1. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 22:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

which i was doing. Wikipedia is open to all to edit except Jews it seems. 96.81.123.61 (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Jewish. Wikipedia is open to all to edit except the disruptive. Don't make this about your religion when it's not. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.