User talk:98.122.20.56

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, 98.122.20.56, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – 70.51.44.60 (talk) 22:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous
Teahouse logo
Hello! 98.122.20.56, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!


Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without an account, your IP address (98.122.20.56) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!

Reference errors on 13 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English[edit]

Information icon In a recent edit to the page Gun politics in Ireland, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 12:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


I am reverting the revert made by Ww2censor for a couple of reasons (and I will reiterate this on their talk page):
  • Ww2censor has been lazy and simply reverted my whole edit, instead of changing the specific detail that they had issue with.
  • Ww2censor is incorrect in his assertion that a) I do not "respect" other peoples' version of English and b) that the spelling I changed was wrong. To clarify, the spelling in English (which is the form of spelling that is used in the Republic of Ireland) for the NOUN is '(a) licence'. The VERB is '(to) license'. Likewise, the spelling in English for the VERB is 'licensing' and 'licensed'. The same is true for the words 'practice/practise' and 'advice/advise'.

--98.122.20.56 (talk) 16:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to say that's just US centric BS. I have reverted you a 2nd time. Take it to the talk page if you are so determied to make those changes and see if other editors agree with you. ww2censor (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your accusation of "US-centric bullshit" is actually laughable, as I'm not actually from the USA! My IP is. Also, as I've pointed out, there is a spelling difference in English for the verb and the noun. There is no such differentiation in US-English.
If you have reverted my whole edit, without attention to the edits which concerned things other than the spelling of licence, then I will revert your revert. You may revert those edits I made to the spelling of licence without consequence from me, until I find a citation. Do not revert peoples' edits wholesale - only revert the parts of a person's edit that you have concerns about in the future. Thanks. --98.122.20.56 (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Gun politics in Ireland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ww2censor (talk) 21:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Erin go bragh may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • banner at one of their conventions, expressing pride in their [[Irish people|Irish identity]].<ref>{{

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 22:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parliamentary Commissioner Act (Northern Ireland) 1969 (March 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
Still needs any amount of in-depth third-party sources overall about it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Murry1975 (talk) 10:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

See Talk:Evacuations of civilians in Britain during the Second World War[edit]

Stating seriously contested assertions as facts[edit]

Please avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts as you did here. In Wikipedia the aim is to describe disputes, but not engage in them. Thank you. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Parliamentary Commissioner Act (Northern Ireland) 1969[edit]

Hello, 98.122.20.56. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Parliamentary Commissioner Act (Northern Ireland) 1969".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:98.122.20.56&oldid=1076694203"