User talk:98.141.247.50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Crane fly worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Oliver202 (talk) 01:34, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to J, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~NerdyScienceDude () 02:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cereal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JV Smithy (talk) 02:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

3 month block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 3 months, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 14:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Woodberry Forest School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. — Io Katai ᵀᵃˡᵏ 00:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page MythBusters. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wayne Olajuwon chat 00:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Takbir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 01:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Houston Texans, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 01:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010[edit]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Terry McAuliffe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 09:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sean Kingston, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gfoley4 | Wanna chat? 01:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sean Kingston. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gfoley4 | Wanna chat? 01:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sean Kingston, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gfoley4 | Wanna chat? 01:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sean Kingston, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gfoley4 | Wanna chat? 01:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 01:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sam Cooke, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sam Cooke was changed by 98.141.247.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952642 on 2011-09-23T18:18:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Switzerland. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Brisbane Bullets, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Brisbane Bullets was changed by 98.141.247.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951848 on 2011-09-29T01:08:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Provence, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Alpha Quadrant (alt) talk 18:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Wikipelli. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Skeletal formula with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wikipelli Talk 14:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Two-toed sloth, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Two-toed sloth was changed by 98.141.247.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970385 on 2012-01-18T01:56:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nonverbal communication, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nonverbal communication was changed by 98.141.247.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930035 on 2012-03-30T01:20:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nonverbal communication. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Allens (talk | contribs) 01:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cunene River, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Allens (talk | contribs) 11:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pax Mongolica, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pax Mongolica was changed by 98.141.247.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886469 on 2012-04-27T01:36:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pax Mongolica with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Guðsþegn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Oceania because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Guðsþegn (talk) 03:34, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 04:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]