User talk:99.245.174.5

November 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Maryam d'Abo has been reverted.
Your edit here to Maryam d'Abo was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://ethnicelebs.com/maryam-dabo) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:01, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

I will change the source but I didn't see the cite mentioned on the wiki link. Why is it so bad? 99.245.174.5 (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This IP address has been blocked for persistent disruptive editing including personal attacks in edit summaries. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -SpuriousQ (talk) 04:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to proove that it was silly for the 1950 census to not be used for wiki articles as there are other wiki articles that use censuses for living people 99.245.174.5 (talk) 04:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That in no way justifies the gross personal attacks that you committed. —C.Fred (talk) 04:46, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you keep beeing harrased like how morrbidthoughts was to me and undooing all of my hard work you tend to snap. It happens to all of us and you wiki editors pretend it doesn't as you act perfect. 99.245.174.5 (talk) 04:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you were harassed—and I don't see evidence that you were—it does not justify attacks of that severity. —C.Fred (talk) 04:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you have been through the abuse that I have been through in life, it seems justified. Also he was harrassing me as he was always udooing my hard work just because it was from a living person. 99.245.174.5 (talk) 05:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to reviewing WP:No personal attacks, you'll need to review WP:Biographies of living people before you return to editing, to understand why it is important to have solidly reliable sources for information about living people. —C.Fred (talk) 14:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see what is wrong with using the 1950 census for living people as these wiki articles use the 1940 and 1950 census for these living people to find the birth dates and birth names for them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melinda_Dillon#cite_ref-2 , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_Stevens , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Adams , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Hamilton_(actress) 99.245.174.5 (talk) 15:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFF. "We do it in X, so let's do it in Y" is not a valid rationale. Now, why it's used in the other articles, and whether it's appropriate, is matter for consideration at those articles' talk pages—and outside the scope of discussion for the next month because of your block. —C.Fred (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well that is frankly a very moronic rationale because none of the article's talk pages have a discussion on including a birthdate based on the census and I went over them to make sure. This is just pure inconsistency on you wiki editors part and not my fault as I was trying to provide consistency. 99.245.174.5 (talk) 15:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Barbara Bach. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2023[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 01:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.