User talk:99of9/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
WikiProject Australian biota
{{user WikiProject Australian biota}}
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Australian biota. |
New message from Chess
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Education noticeboard § RfC on banning word or edit counts for student assignments. This is because you're listed as a point of contact for the University of Sydney with respect to the Wikipedia Education Program and this RfC will likely affect a course at that institution. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 23:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
data tribulations
have managed to sort a few things with another, will try to be a nuisance soon... JarrahTree 12:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Fixed archiving of your talk page
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the archive settings on this page. It looks like they've never worked. They should work now, or if you'd prefer to keep archiving manually, feel free to remove them. --rchard2scout (talk) 10:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
data tribulations
have managed to sort a few things with another, will try to be a nuisance soon... JarrahTree 12:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- @JarrahTree: Great. Sorry - I've been prepping for this event tomorrow morning: Wikipedia:GLAM/Australian_libraries_and_WP/Events/City_of_Sydney_First_Nations. --99of9 (talk) 12:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Never apologise - there is a need for a big discussion off wiki perhaps later down the line - best of luck for the event! JarrahTree 12:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Precious anniversary
| |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
St John
Do you recall where you first found this ref to the sketchbook ? Seems it was an actual sighting with a page and later other refs added, maybe personal collection ? Can you send a pic of the front back inside cover ? Just to fill the ref out and note it well. Dave Rave (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Dave Rave: Yes, it is a hardcopy of a self-published booklet, which I have in my personal collection. I've located it again, but it doesn't have much info. The front cover has text: "A SKETCHBOOK OF ST JOHN'S ASHFIELD 1840-1980". The inside first page repeats exactly that. The back cover has a drawing and label "Mrs. Elizabeth Underwood". The inside back cover has a drawing and "A SECTION OF THE ROSE GARDEN". The details I did get came from the foreword (3rd page) by Stanford R Colefax, Rector. He writes "The concept of A Sketchbook of St John's comes from Miss Ruth Smith and Mr Ron White to whom we are grateful for this presentation." So I don't think there's much more I can add. Do you want me to scan any of those? It's not an academic work, but it seems to have decent local on-the-ground knowledge. --99of9 (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- not that I'm worried about OR it helps if you document the un-findable refs you are using. I had an obscure ref to a magazine I found a copy of the mag online and managed to get pics of the pages for posterity. Also, others (me) might recognise other worthy notations that could be used Dave Rave (talk) 00:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Croatia–Philippines relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Croatia–Philippines relations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Philippines relations (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Request unblock
99of9 hello. I blocked in Commons. Please help for unblock me. I am professional photographer who's travel around the world and take photos. I am here mostly for upload my photo. Please check my credits in official website, Instagram or Facebook. I also have registered company. Thank you. Photo Eminency (talk) 11:46, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Photo Eminency: blocking is not really about how good you are at photography. It's more about whether you follow the rules on Wikimedia sites. It looks like you didn't follow the anti-sockpuppetry rules. Why not? --99of9 (talk) 01:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)