User talk:A306200130048123

This is User A306200130048123's talk page. Any questions? Simply edit this talk page! eMail me at A306200130048123@hotmail.co.uk.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A306200130048123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am going to request to be unblocked for the simple reason, there is no evidence, no sockpuppet investigation/casepage, no discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and finally + most importantly I am not a sockpuppet. Please unblock me under Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 17:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A306200130048123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel I should be unblocked as I will not continue to cause damage or disruption and will make useful contributions instead. However relevant or not I am not a sockpuppet of User Mcjakeqcool.

Decline reason:

I feel that I agree with the blocking administrator that you are a sock puppet of a banned user. Please go do something else that is constructive, either online (assuming you haven't already been banned everywhere else already) or offline. –MuZemike 20:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reason for block[edit]

If I have been blocked under Wikipedia:Call a spade a spade why and what evidence is there. Also please try to stick to Wikipedia:Don't stuff beans up your nose. A306200130048123 (talk) 21:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't going to give you my justification, ironically per the same essay you just quoted (WP:BEANS). But look at this for an explanation. Basically, you're not fooling anyone. You've been blocked multiple times before, don't you think it's time you moved on from Wikipedia? You're going to be caught every time. -- Atama頭 22:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for that link. I appreciate Atama's explanation. P.S Have a piping hot piece of chicken. Spread the wikilove! A306200130048123 (talk) 11:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]