User talk:ACM7

{{unblock-auto|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Pointer22". The reason given for Pointer22's block is: "Edit warring".|3=CambridgeBayWeather|4=7038480}

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ACM7. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ACM7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What can be done to remove the block, so we can discuss the language use on the Allen Meadors Wikipedia page?

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts; you will need to address that in any future unblock request.--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ACM7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WE did use multiple accounts because we were being ask questions and at the same time blocked from replying to them. We would appreciate the chance to put the section in question to rest. If the section is necessary in this Wikipedia page then we hope we can come to some satisfactory position for those who know Dr.Meadors and those who don't. Thank you ACM7 (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While you were blocked, you should have either appealed your block or sat it out. You shouldn't have created new accounts to evade the block. PhilKnight (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We apologize for not know the proper protocol. When will we be allowed to address this issue. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACM7 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I explained the protocol to you here, but you continued to set up new accounts. Your block is indefinite, so you will only be allowed to edit again if you successfully request to be unblocked. Please also note that shared accounts are not permitted. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ACM7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please allow this account to be unblocked, so we may participate in conversations regarding the narrative in sections. It would be ok to not be able to edit the Wikipedia as long as have the ability to point out misleading or incorrect information. Thank you 12/6/2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACM7 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please have only one unblock request open. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have fixed your unblock request, ACM7. You forgot to close the curly brackets at the end, meaning that the template did not work. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who are "we"? Max Semenik (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explained here, Max Semenik. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ACM7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MaxSem, the we represent several UCA alums who feel the media often misrepresent facts and we have tried to get the truth put forward. Going in we did not know that we could share our thoughts on each others pages. We will not do that going forward. Each of us do want to be able to provide factual information when appropriate. Thank you

Decline reason:

As above, shared accounts are not permitted. SQL ^{Query me!} 19:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SQL, yes, acknowledge understand shared accounts not permitted, will not share accounts anymore. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACM7 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't assume that people are watching your talk page for comments, ACM7. If you want to make another unblock request, you need to use the template to get admin attention. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not tech knowledgeable, don't have a clue about a template. Just lucky to be able to find this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACM7 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request to be unblocked. Thank you

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ACM7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

request to be unblock so we can all work on fair deliver of the section

Decline reason:

This is the FIFTH unblock request. You still aren't addressing the reason you are blocked. I'm not sure why, but you are now clearly just wasting our time. As such, I have revoked your talk page access. You can appeal to WP:UTRS, but if you choose to do so, you will need to clearly address the reasons you were blocked. Yamla (talk) 02:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ACM7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17098 was submitted on Dec 12, 2016 02:38:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ACM7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17165 was submitted on Dec 20, 2016 03:31:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]