User talk:Aadagger

Talat

More precisely, your wording says that Talat was a member of the CUP, and that he was responsible for the Armenian Genocide. Now, I doubt that he personally killed everyone himself, and I doubt that he alone passed the edicts that started it, seeing as how it was a Committee. Again, the history is dependent on who you ask (and by the way, the articles indicate that statements claiming the CUP went after the Armenians as "dubious". Right or wrong, it's not a clear statement, and I don't agree with that statement being presented as clear-cut elsewhere). Now, what I think you want to say (though I don't agree with saying it) is that the Committee was responsible for the genocide, and I don't believe that that is appropriate for an entry on Talat alone. I think that if you want to mention that he was on the Committee and wikilink it or that he was Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire (meaning how the entry stands now), that's fine, but anything more than that is POV-pushing one way or the other. MSJapan (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Turkish Invasion of Cyprus

I appreciate your contributions in the article. Can you please spell out your recent concerns in the talk page? Surely a consensus can be reached.Larisv (talk) 21:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)