User talk:Abutsagem

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem

Hello Abutsagem,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem, you may be blocked from editing. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem

Hello Abutsagem,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Please understand

Wikipedia is not a place for writing about yourself - please see WP:AUTOBIO. To have an article, a person must be shown to pass WP:BIO, with reliable independent sources WP:RS to prove the notability. There is no sign so far that you do pass WP:BIO, and I would advise you not to go on posting about yourself. When you do pass, someone will write about you. Peridon (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Abubakar Abdulkarim Tsagem. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Abutsagem reported by User:Arthistorian1977 (Result: ). Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abutsagem, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You've been blocked for repeated recreation of a properly-deleted article and for abusing multiple accounts. See the edit warring report and the sockpuppet report. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)