User talk:Acuhealth
Suggestion[edit]
Hi, I have followed your discussions at Acupuncture, thought I would give you my 2 cents....feel free to delete if you do not like my advice. Please also see my comment here at the acupuncture talk page. Wikipedia policy dictates that the lead should summarize the body of the article. Most of your edits seem to be only to the lead. If you are so inclined to improve the acupuncture article, I would suggest updating the body of the article first with any research that is discussed in relevant secondary sources. The body of the article here currently only mentions that there is no physical correlates with acupuncture points! Thus, the lead is currently a good summary of this. I have listed a bunch of secondary sources on the talk page that discuss this topic and discuss some preliminary research that suggests differences along meridians, etc. If there is anything worth being incorporated into the body of the article, then it should be done first and the lead can be modified afterwards to reflect this. If you approach the lead first, it is hard to get consensus and is not consistent with policy. Best regards Puhlaa (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- If you feel so inclined, here are some secondary sources that could be used to add relevant text to this section of body of the article:
- Electrical PropertiesofAcupuncture Points and Meridians: A Systematic Review
- Electrical Characterization of Acupuncture Points: Technical Issues and Challenges Ahn 2007
- Characterizing Acupuncture Stimuli Using Brain Imaging with fMRI - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature Huang et al 2012
- How do acupuncture and moxibustion act? - Focusing on the progress in Japanese acupuncture research Kawakita et al. 2006
- Neuroanatomical basis of acupuncture treatment for some common illnesses Cheng 2009