User talk:Adam9007/A7 myths debunked

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Great work[edit]

Brilliant, and well-experienced analysis. The fact that this much analysis has to be brought to bear in the first place is a strong indication that A7 needs revision, or at very least some clarifying footnotes.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  16:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SMcCandlish: Thank you! But sadly, this hasn't done much to make me feel better over my topic ban in all but name, or to stop me retiring again I've already retired once over this, and it's happening all over again elsewhere . Adam9007 (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize there was a de-facto TBan. As for the MoS fiasco, I just hatted that discussion with a bit of a tsk-tsk for incivility. PS: My post about ANI on your main talk page wasn't intended to sound menacing, but rather alerting you of a cloud brewed up by others.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  23:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]