User talk:FatiguedSoul

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Adeel.shams)


December 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bharatiya Janata Party has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Bernie Sanders shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 14:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Sanders[edit]

The term "junior" is not contentious in that context. Every state has two senators, a senior senator and a junior senator. Strict seniority. Bernie is the junior senator from Vermont (behind Patrick Leahy, who is the senior senator). Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at your other recent edits, and see that someone else already removed your edits to Monica Lewinsky. I reverted your edits to Hillary Clinton as inappropriate. The fact that she is a candidate for the presidency is one of the most important things about her, so belongs at the top of the lede. The lede section should be no more than four paragraphs, and this one was flagged as specifically extended to five not being an error. You removed that flag and extended it to six paragraphs. The changes you made about Libya were strongly non-neutral point of view. So I reverted the changes. Please discuss these changes in the talk page before trying them again, we don't need edit wars on the articles about the major candidates. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, FatiguedSoul. You have new messages at Tarl N.'s talk page.
Message added 22:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tarl N. (talk) 22:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]