User talk:Aditya debnath wiki

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Aditya debnath wiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2018–19 I-League, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Coderzombie (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018–19 I-League[edit]

The article 2018–19 I-League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no clarity in what shape the tournament will be held or held at all. So too early to create a page WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

page creation[edit]

Your efforts to add content are appreciated, but please do not create new pages until you have enough sources and content to create the new page. You can start the page under your own username, e.g. like I did for User:Coderzombie/2018–19 Bengaluru FC season, you can then move it to main space when the season starts. Coderzombie (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing man?? Do you not understand what I am saying??? Coderzombie (talk) 06:42, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Coderzombie. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Coderzombie (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2018 Indian Super Cup. Coderzombie (talk) 05:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you![edit]

Thanks for creating 2018–19 I-League. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 06:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Number of football clubs in India[edit]

Hello, Aditya debnath wiki. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Number of football clubs in India, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Lineslarge (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC) This page does not exist.[reply]

2018–19 Calcutta Premier Division moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 2018–19 Calcutta Premier Division, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:38, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

STOP MOVING PAGES[edit]

If you don't understand what you are doing, please don't keep moving pages without consulting other editors. Coderzombie (talk) 07:45, 1 July 2018 (UTC) OKAY but what is your real name?[reply]

What's that got to do with anything? I really insist that you go through basic etiquettes of editing Wikipedia before doing any more edits. Coderzombie (talk) 15:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of football clubs in West Bengal[edit]

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Aditya debnath wiki, thanks for creating List of football clubs in West Bengal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more references. You can't use Wikipedia as a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goals in 2017-18 Indian Football Season moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Goals in 2017-18 Indian Football Season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:15, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2017-18 Calcutta First Division moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 2017-18 Calcutta First Division, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:16, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt[edit]

Since much of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, like you did with List of Bengaluru FC seasons. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:49, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bengaluru FC kit history[edit]

The article Bengaluru FC kit history has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The page for just a set of kit for the club? Not notable. Please don't create such pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 13:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are many such pages in same format:-

These are clubs with hundreds of years of history, so there's content to justify those pages. BFC is barely 5 years old club. This article should be deleted. Coderzombie (talk) 16:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Then delete this page.I will request for speedy deletion.

Your contributed article, History of Borussia Dortmund[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, History of Borussia Dortmund. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Borussia Dortmund. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Borussia Dortmund. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 09:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2017-18 Youth I-League competitions[edit]

The article 2017-18 Youth I-League competitions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is not notable. Does not pass WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 13:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali wikipedia[edit]

Dear contributor, Thank you for your valuable and regular contribution in English Wikipedia. You are requested to contribute in Bengali wiki pages at the same time and to contact with Bengali Wikimedia group, to attend meet up. You may keep msg in my talk page, thanking you. Pinakpani (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Football tournaments in India (August 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at All India Football Federation. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The information in this article already exists in the AIFF article, with the exception of the "current champions" column.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Football tournaments in India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Football tournaments in India, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 11:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aditya debnath wiki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer talk 11:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Nike Premier Cup[edit]

Why did you recreate 2018 Nike Premier Cup page? The tournament is not notable. Please request speedy deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 12:35, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at South West Asian Football Federation (SWAFF), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Coderzombie (talk) 18:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Nike Premier Cup[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2018 Nike Premier Cup, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Matthew_hk t c 19:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhishe78. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 19:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: now located in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aditya debnath wiki. Matthew_hk t c 07:26, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aditya debnath wiki[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Aditya debnath wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018 Nike Premier Cup for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Nike Premier Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Nike Premier Cup (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matthew_hk t c 23:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pathachakra F.C. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pathachakra F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathachakra F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matthew_hk t c 08:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

I have two more accounts on Aditya debnath1234567890 and Aditya debnath atk I dont use them as it is my main account but I have no connection with Avishek78.You should block other accounts. I have created articles which are not required. I assure that I will consult other Wikipedia users before creating articles. Now how can I edit Wikipedia articles again and how can this user be unblocked?Aditya debnath wiki (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow WP:SO and then using {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} Hhkohh (talk) 16:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aditya debnath wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason of why should this account be unblocked is that I have now understood how should I edit to Wikipedia and reply to other users when a discussion is going on. I am not bent on vandalism in fact I have undo vandalism by other users and also contribute to wikipedia by updating Indian football articles. I should be given a 2nd chance so that I can again contribute to Wikipedia. If you see that I am again making disrupting edits or articles then you can again block me Aditya debnath wiki (talk) 03:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Aditya debnath wiki:, "Aditya debnath wiki" and Aditya debnath Atk accounts were blocked because you have been told to stick to one account (wikipedian did allow multiple accounts such as running bot, login in public computers etc), and your excuse of "losing password" was no longer existed, but you still using two accounts at the same time in July, on top of "retiring" two more. For talk page and recreating deleted articles, that is another issue, but not the reason of your block. Matthew_hk t c 03:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other two aditya debnath accounts are nt in use and you can block those accounts forever.Aditya debnath wiki (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aditya debnath wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I was blocked was because I was using multiple account. But now I have stopped other accounts and they are blocked. I will never use them again. Previously I didn't know about sockpuppetry but now I have fully understood it. I am again making unblocking request to convince admins that I will no longer make disruptive edits to Wikipedia. If a discussion is going on about page deletion I will reply to that. I will make useful edits to Wikipedia and not vandalized it in any form. Also this account was blocked due to true evidence of sockpuppetry i,e, use of multiple accounts but I am telling that those accounts are no longer in use by me or anyone others. Aditya debnath1234567890 and Aditya debnath atk accounts should be blocked. Those accounts were created as I didn't knew that there can't be multiple Wikipedia accounts. But now I hve knowledge of how to use and edit Wikipedia. I will not vandalism wikipedia or attack Wikipedia users as I did to user:Coderzombie and I apolize to that. I am requesting to the admins that please unblock this account so that I can again contribute to wikipedia and update those articles. I will consult other users before creating articles or ask them to create. Also other "aditya debnath" accounts will not be used. It was the main reasons of block. Now I will stick to this account only. I will always make legal edits to wikipedia and not vandalizing Wikipedia. Please do not decline this request. Thank you.Aditya debnath wiki (talk) 11:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aditya debnath wiki (talk) 12:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think admin are unlikely to unblock you at this time because of your unblock reason. You had better wait 6 month without any edit per Standard offer and your talk page access may be revoked Hhkohh (talk) 13:34, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a CheckUser and thus cannot lift a CheckUser block, but I don't see why we'd have to wait six months here. Hhkohh, what abuse of the talk page am I missing that might make revoking access necessary? Huon (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I also do not see any talk page abuse, which would be necessarily present before talk page block would be considered.----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I am sorry. I do not think he abused talk page, so no need to revoke talk page access. But Standard offer is really needed for him Hhkohh (talk) 03:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLOCK[edit]

When will my block end. I can't know what is the expiry date. It is written "your block has been set indefinite"Aditya debnath wiki (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The block has been imposed by Bbb23 and links to a sockpuppet investigation that does not exist. So I've got no idea exactly why you were blocked. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: the case was moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aditya debnath wiki without leaving a redirect. Matthew_hk t c 13:17, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If he says he's only going to use one account, and isn't otherwise being disruptive (a couple of articles have been up for deletion, but not necessarily blockable, though I do admit it's borderline), what's the issue? I can see problems with creating poor quality content, and getting stuff deleted, and possibly a communication banner - why didn't we explore that angle? Instead of learning how to improve as an editor, he's been defending himself against strawman arguments, in my opinion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:21, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not biting but just submitting SPI reports which end up with positive and negative CU outcome (so that SPI case was split and moved) as well as "Aditya debnath wiki" was informed to use one account but still going to do so. I don't comment on CU admin on blocking master and sock for first offender indef. And yes, the other edit issue is another thing that not related to his current block. Matthew_hk t c 14:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And why is my unblock request isn't being reviewed. Don't block my user page for saying this but I think that they don't want me to contribute to wikipedia, and also my other accounts are blocked even if I want to use them I cannot so its your decision.Aditya debnath wiki (talk) 11:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Aditya debnath wiki/2019 I-League 2nd Division[edit]

Hello, Aditya debnath wiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019 I-League 2nd Division".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Matthew hk (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Football tournaments in India[edit]

Hello, Aditya debnath wiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Football tournaments in India".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:I-League transfers for 2018-19 season[edit]

Hello, Aditya debnath wiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "I-League transfers for 2018-19 season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2017-18 Calcutta First Division[edit]

Hello, Aditya debnath wiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2017-18 Calcutta First Division".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pathachakra F.C. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pathachakra F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathachakra F.C. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 05:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]