User talk:Adityapowar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Arpit Vageria[edit]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Adityapowar, thanks for creating Arpit Vageria!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Too many blog posts and interviees, not enough in depth, independent sources, or evudence of awards/bestsellers. A few too mamy peacock words and a lede that's far too long. Fix these, and we might have a nice article and evidence of notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 19:56, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adityapowar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There is no article I've created for the promotional purpose. I serve wikipedia as a contribution, always. Please life the block from my account. It's so wrong Yamla you block people without knowing anything. People take their time and contribute wikipedia for good. Please lift the block from my account and stop blocking people for no reason

Decline reason:

Please only address your own behavior and actions in your unblock request and not that of others- Yamla did not block you for no reason. You have indeed created promotional articles, one about yourself. Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell the world about themselves or promote others. In order to be unblocked, you will need to indicate that you are familiar with policies like WP:AUTO, WP:COI, and WP:N- and also tell us what types of edits you intend to make if unblocked. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adityapowar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As replied by the administrator about I create promotional article, we did not create the article about myself. There is an another person named Aditya Powar and not me. I understand wikipedia is not a social media and I would like to contribute to wikipedia for good cause. I am familiar with policies like WP:AUTO, WP:COI, and WP:N- and would not mislead any of them. I didn't create any article for promotional purposes. One article I created is of an well known Indian author named Aript Vageria, who is notable and verifiable. I promise contributiong wikipedia with Geniune information if the administrator lifts my block. Thanks!

Decline reason:

Obvious WP:COI. Article is salted, so I'm not sure why you're pursuing an unblock anyway unless you were interested in writing about something besides "the other" Aditya Powar. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm confused- are you saying that your name is Aditya Powar but you are not the Aditya Powar you wrote about? 331dot (talk) 14:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Article I created Named 'Aditya Powar' is not about me. He is a well known Indian author I wrote the article about and not me. [1] And the second article I created is about the author named 'Arpit Vageria' who is also a well known Indian author. [2] I actually create articles about Indian authors and scriptwriters, and help wikipedia writing existing articles into Indian regional languages for the people of India making wikipedia open to them too.

So, your name is Aditya Power but you are not the person you wrote about? 331dot (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's Correct Sir.
Yamla, what do you think? 331dot (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, My full name goes 'Aditya Arun Powar' and the person I created the article about his full name goes 'Aditya Bandopant Powar' this is mere misunderstanding Sir.

Okay, but I want to hear from Yamla first. 331dot (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Sir. If given chance, I would love to Contribute to wikipedia in and ways I could, keeping in mind all the policies of Wikipedia.

This user has disclosed that they work at Filmcaves Entertainment; see the user page. Given that Filmcaves Entertainment was founded by Adittia Powar and manages Aditya Powar, there's a clear conflict of interest here. I do not believe this user should be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree. I won't formally decline this as I already did, but I also would recommend against unblocking. 331dot (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have already told sir, this two people are not same and they are different. This is mere a min-understanding because of the same names. I could give you my government issued identification if needed for verification.
The issue is no longer your name (and never offer to provide personal identity documents in this public forum) but the fact you have a conflict of interest and are a paid editor. Again, I am no longer formally reviewing this block, but I suspect that to be unblocked you will need to agree to not edit about your clients or films and tell us what you will edit about instead. I don't have anything else to say at this time. 331dot (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sue sir, I wont be editing for my clients, and those weren't my clients at the first place sir. I agree to the terms that I would contribute authentic information to wikipedia

Given that you work for Filmcaves Entertainment and given that Aditya Powar is claimed to be a client of Filmcaves Entertainment, in what way exactly can you honestly claim these aren't your clients? --Yamla (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I work for Filmcaves Entertainment and not the person I created an article for. And I never created an article or promoted the company I work for which is Filmcaves Entertainment Sir. I am the client for Filmcaves and not the person I created the article. I even don't known that person personally. I created the article for him only because he is a public figure.

This is not an honest account of the situation. I suggest it's time to shut down this user's talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 15:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the protection from the pages ypu deleted. Atleast some other editors could create a useful article for wikipedia Adityapowar (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion[edit]

This user was caught evading a block, as Aa015 (talk · contribs), in July, 2018. They attempted to recreate the promotional article and lied about their relationship. --Yamla (talk) 21:37, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]