User talk:Aejudy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betsy Sullenger (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Aejudy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betsy Sullenger (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betsy Sullenger (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 09:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betsy Sullenger (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Betsy Sullenger, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Betsy Sullenger has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Betsy Sullenger. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Aejudy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Let me correct myself: I am not actually getting paid to make this article, by anyone nor any company. I have corrected my statement on the Teahouse page. I stated that originally because I was under the impression that anyone who creates an article from scratch about a public figure must be paid to do so. Obviously, I was wrong in this assumption. So no, I AM NOT getting paid, nor do I gain any benefit from creating the article. Aejudy (talk) 03:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Aejudy

Disclose your employer on your user page, now

Hello Aejudy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aejudy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aejudy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

If you take any other actions on this site beyond posting the paid template on your user page, you may be blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Given that you have stated at Teahouse "being paid to make a wiki article", what Ian.t wrote applies - it is ESSENTIAL that you post the paid template on your User page before any new edits. David notMD (talk) 22:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Let me correct myself: I am not actually getting paid to make this article, by anyone nor any company. I have corrected my statement on the Teahouse page. I stated that originally because I was under the impression that anyone who creates an article from scratch about a public figure must be paid to do so. Obviously, I was wrong in this assumption. So no, I AM NOT getting paid, nor do I gain any benefit from creating the article.Aejudy (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Aejudy

So you claimed to be paid even though you are not? What caused you to write about Betsy Sullenger? 331dot (talk) 08:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

It's far easier to believe that someone who was being paid to edit would lie about doing so than to believe that someone not being paid would find it necessary to lie about it. Even if the latter case were true, you're just demonstrating that we can't trust you. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for demonstrating that we can't trust you to properly disclose your employment per our terms of use.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 12:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aejudy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand why I was originally blocked, as I did lie about getting paid. However, as a new wikipedia user, as stated, I only did so because I was under the impression that anyone making a page from scratch needed to be paid to do so. I know this seems silly, but that I what I believed. According to the Guide to Appealing blocks, "you will not be unblocked unless the reviewing administrator is convinced that you understand what you are blocked for, and that you will not do it again." Therefore, I will not lie again in my questions on the help page and I will disclose from now the truth, which is that I am a new user. Again, according to the Guide, I was not making any disruptive edits, nor was I rude. I have only been trying to make a wikipedia page.Aejudy (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Aejudy

Decline reason:

Either you lied before about being paid, or you are lying now about not being paid. I'm inclined to believe you are lying now. Yamla (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Betsy Sullenger concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Betsy Sullenger, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Betsy Sullenger

Hello, Aejudy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Betsy Sullenger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)