User talk:Aevensen

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

AEvensen (talk · contribs) has been paid by Rob Wood to create the page ClicData.

Hi all,

I am a volunteer editor, but am occasionally paid to fix pages with issues as part of a marketing package I sell.

I have been paid to create the following pages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kurt_Iswarienko https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClicData https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UpShow

I have volunteered to create the following pages without pay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CaraNua https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Knudson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Tonioli

Any other pages I've created have been random/unrelated contributions. I occasionally take article jobs via Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/fl/alexandriaevensen2

Aevensen, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Aevensen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Landry Simmons[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Landry Simmons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kurt Iswarienko[edit]

Hi Aevensen. I've moved the article back to draft space once again, because it still has fundamental problems. I'm asking for help, as I don't know what to do next here. --Ronz (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenn Rawson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glenn Rawson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Toddst1 (talk) 23:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UpShow for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UpShow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UpShow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 10:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aevensen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm still learning the ropes and have disclosed on my talk page the best I know how. Please provide some guidance on how to proceed. I'm a tech guru, so I'd like to continue creating pages for companies for information purposes (both paid and unpaid) but I want to do everything by the book. Aevensen (talk) 17:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Perhaps you should have considered "learning the ropes" before you tried to make Wikipedia your personal cash-cow. As it is, you have abused the community's trust sufficiently that you no longer have a place here. If you want to undertake SEO work for your clients, you will have to do so elsewhere. Yunshui ^雲 _水 20:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are blocked for violating the conflict of interest guideline, tendentiously moving paid-for spam into mainspace and abusing Wikipedia to promote your clients. MER-C 17:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MER-CBut I can't fix it? I can simply never edit on Wikipedia again? Aevensen 17:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE: (edit conflict) "I'm still learning the ropes". I seem to see this a lot with SPI and and promo (UPE) editing unblock requests. "Information purposes" is definitely a catchphrase user by those here to promote their COI interests. Best way you know how? List each and every subject you are being paid to edit about and who is doing so. Read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. You will need to place a notice on each and every related talk page. You will not move any page out of "Drafts" into article space. There's more, but this is off the top of my head. Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user also has a CU-confirmed sock account: User:Hellydolly4893 (blocked). Yunshui ^雲 _水 20:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]