User talk:Aforceone

Welcome[edit]

Welcome...

Hello, Aforceone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. You may also be interested in our intuitive guide to Wikipedia. Again, welcome! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 07:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please note also that for a conflict of interests it is generally a bad thing to edit articles you're personally involved. If one user inserts inappropriate expressions, you can report this on Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard. Phoe (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You referred to Audley Harrison as "my Client" on the ANI posting. What is your business relationship with Harrison?

Per Phoe's note, conflicts of interest are an obvious issue on Wikipedia, and editing where you may have one challenges our policy requiring neutral edits and article content. If you have been editing and have not disclosed it you need to disclose the relationship now.

Additionally, being paid to edit Wikipedia is outright prohibited.

Please let us know what the facts are here - we can advise how you can avoid falling further afoul of our policies.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Audley Harrison has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 18:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will use the edit summary for future posts. I do think edit is constructive and facutally correct.Aforceone (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

saskatchewanSenator suggested the following. 'Any errors in the chronology of events surrounding the end of the BBC contract should be corrected, but I don't think Audley "left England for good." Audley's statements about the BBC can be included in the article, but they are not important enough to be in the lead paragraph. The nickname section is overly negative and should be rewritten in a more balanced tone, but the Daily Mail quotation you added isn't directly relevant to his nicknames and shouldn't be in that section. I'm not aware of the agreement you write about above. Regardless, past decisions are not binding. Cheers--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 07:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

I think we are better served to remove the nickname section all together. Its a fact that A Force is Audley's own nickname and the negative names used are dated back 2005/06. It is rarely used today.Aforceone (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. It is notable, referenced information and should not be removed.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 07:46, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to the edit you made to Audley Harrison. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. --SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 04:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanksAforceone (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The press stories today about Audley Harrison do not use Fraudley, A Farce or Audrey. These Nicknames were associated with the earlier part of his career and do not apply today. The consensus section provides a logical approach in the fact that wiki must be open to change as with all things. The following articles depict Audley's current image in the Media / http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/sport/821645/DAVID-HAYE-is-lining-up-a-Battle-of-Britain-clash-against-Audley-Harrison-after-talks-with-Wladimir-Klitschko-stalled.html / http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/general/others/boxing-hayemaker-lands-blow-for-fellow-fighters-842458.html / http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2010/apr/09/audley-harrison-boxing-michael-sprott - even he has reverted to calling Audley by his name. I think its clear the general consensus of the media in Britain ( the rest of the Worlds media do not call Audley anything but Audley / Harrison or A Force, http://www.vcstar.com/news/2010/may/15/fighting-for-everything/ ), has changed about Audley and it will be OK to remove the nickname section from the site.

Please explain a logical reason to keep it there, if you do not conquer with my comments. I hope we can move forward on this and stay away from the Dispute resolution process. Aforceone (talk) 16:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aforceone. You have new messages at SaskatchewanSenator's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Signature[edit]

You should only add ~~~~ to sign when you are writing on a talk page (that's one with talk in the title). You don't need to put it in edit summaries and should not put it in articles. Stifle (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oK thanks. will amend