User talk:AgentCDE

Welcome!

Hello, AgentCDE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rama's arrow 17:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking Page[edit]

I reverted the article Landmark Education Jargon not blanking it - please look at the whole thread! That was already discussed extensively and then it was "repopulated after it was decided by consensus as non-notable ad redirected to the original article. After that article deleted that content as non-notable the minority view points tried to reverse the consensus decision to redirect this article. I have now set it up for deletion. If you could delete it that would be great! Alex Jackl 19:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response - thank you - I thought I put the delete template on the main page. Thanks for pointing that out. We are having a lot of trouble with people pushing minority POV on the Landmark pages and now that their is a concensus and management happening by multiple editors on the Landmark page they are spreading out to "fringe pages" and adding non-notable POV content there. Thanks for your diligence.

Alex Jackl 19:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page was a redirect before Smee started vandalizing it. I reverted his vandalism and then I put an AFD on it. Please look at the page history. Jossi (an admin) came in and worked with us and at the we redirected the page. Smee is now going against that to avoid his pOV-pushing being exposed on the Landmark page. BTW: Smee was the cause of the Landmark page being locked because of his POV pushing. Alex Jackl 20:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of User:AJackl[edit]

You called it like you saw it, appropriately. What you saw was vandalism, pure and simple. The redirect was agreed to after the consensus was to merge the material into the main article. Once that material was removed from the main article, I removed the redirect, to restart a dialogue. Obviously the other user in question does not wish for a dialogue, but rather is content to vandalize. Smee 20:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Absence of link to User Talk[edit]

I believe there is a template called User Talk:<your username goes here> that adds a small link that says talk next to your name. it will help users find their way to your Talk Page. 71.96.77.70 17:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That, I believe, is actually a custom signature, set in the account options. Think I might do that now...--AgentCDE 17:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Testing... There we go.--AgentCDE / Talk / 17:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Doris Day Affair[edit]

Admit it: This is either a fucking riot or a fucking abortion! Take your pick.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.61.97 (talk • contribs)

It's rather bland, actually.--AgentCDE / Talk / 14:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.~~

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Twoply150 (talk • contribs)

Do not add false, libelous userwarnings. And use the templates at least.--AgentCDE / Talk / 06:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

For the quick reversion of vandalism on my userpage, I give you this WikiThanks flower!

Thank you!--AgentCDE / Talk / 19:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page User:Old Firm Fans Forum on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Dfrg.msc 07:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem. Not experimenting. Rolling back to an vandalized version.--AgentCDE / Talk / 07:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry mate. The version looked very much like vandalism (some one should have words about a page clean-up) and the fact that another user was editing confused me further. Sorry for the mix-up. Regards, Dfrg.msc 07:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. The page does look suspect, but I figured it was better to have suspect content than blatant vandalism.--AgentCDE / Talk / 07:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

Sorry about the recent edit on User:DaGeekyNerd/Ataxia. We failed to inform you of this, but we are actually the developers of the game, and we didn't intend to announce the game this early. DaGeekyNerd is a member of our development team, and we'll likely get him to change the page later. Hope we didn't cause any trouble.

Cheers, Andy

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar[edit]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 20:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your vandalism warning[edit]

Please be more careful. I was simply archiving a stale discussion, which you would have noticed if you would have gone to the page instead of using Twinkle. I admire those who battle vandalism, but this was clearly a mistake. Ursasapien (talk) 07:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for your correction. Ursasapien (talk) 07:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:24.4.101.72[edit]

Review WP:OWNTALK before restoring comments on user talk pages. 24.4.101.72 (talk) 07:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noted and replied. I get a bit triggerhappy on these late nights.--AgentCDE / Talk / 07:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. 24.4.101.72 (talk) 07:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, AgentCDE. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]