User talk:Aglrochisat
Hi! What should I do if I am blocked but still want to continue editing?
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 05:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)UTRS 43922[edit]
UTRS appeal #43922 has been closed.
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked.
Ahem. You wrote, " as much as possible". Were there times when it was not possible.
Eh? " I tried to not vandalize, edit warring or add anything unconstructive to the English Wikipedia." To quote Yoda in Star Wars, "Do, or do not. There is no try."
Actually, sharing an IP is not a problem, though I suspect the technical evidence shows more than this. There's a disclosure template. Or you just place a notice on each user page. However, the SPI report states, "Sock created to support/assist when master is reverted for disruption in existing articles or to add on to what the master has added to the existing/newly created articles." This is the sockpuppetry part. Coordinating efforts in an abusive manner.
Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Thank you for your attention to these matters. --Deepfriedokra (talk)07:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Aglrochisat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry that two accounts with the same IP address were created and wikipedia articles were edited using them both. I am also sorry that i didnt read the wikipedia policy on the multiple accounts. But they both were used for good faith and constructive edits only as contribution history will reveal. Kindly unblock my this account, this mistake will not be repeated again. Aglrochisat (talk) 12:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have validated that the other account was not used in good faith but instead was used as described at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aglrochisat/Archive. Yamla (talk) 12:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DYK for Priest-King (sculpture)[edit]
On 16 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Priest-King (sculpture), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Indira Gandhi made Zulfikar Ali Bhutto choose between the sculptures Dancing Girl and Priest-King (pictured) to be returned to Pakistan in 1972? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Priest-king (sculpture). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Priest-King (sculpture)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 9,452 views (787.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2021 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
What should I do if I am blocked but stil want to continue editing? Aglrochisat (talk) 16:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Unblocking[edit]
Aglrochisat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi!is there any way that a blocked user, if he vows that he will not breach Wikipedia rules again can be unblocked? Or am I completely blocked and there is no way that I can ever edit on wikipedia?
1. I admit that I used multiple accounts; because I didn't had read Wikipedia rules on it and sock puppetry.
2. My most edits were constructive, apart from few for which I am sorry. I created following articles on wikipedia:
Kumaralata
Priest-King (sculpture)
List of people from Gandhara etc. to name a few. I also contributed significantly towards Pakistani architecture and Gandhara. In short, I was here to contribute not disrupt. However, I know my actions caused disruption.
3. Kindly note that I did mistakes and I am honestly sorry on them. I will never repeat them if given a chance.
4. So, is there any way to continue as a Wikipedia editor? I want one chance.
5. I am not a bot or Paid user. I am doing editing with my own will, and yes I made mistakes. I am sorry for them.
6. If I cause any disruption, then you will again have authority to block me. Can I be unblocked? If there are some conditions, I will fulfill them.
7. I understand the reason to block me, and will never repeat that mistake again if unblocked. Kindly provide ,me just a chance, I will not repeat this mistake.
8. Please read my whole appeal. Thank you. Stay blessed.
Aglrochisat (talk) 20:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your pathway back to editing would be the standard offer; no edits or socking for six months. That timer would start today. 331dot (talk) 21:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@331dot ok I will wait for 6 months Aglrochisat (talk) 21:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
{{Unblock} }
Request for unblocking Aglrochisat (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Aglrochisat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Request for unblocking Aglrochisat (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)