User talk:Aherron76

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Aherron76, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! PRehse (talk) 17:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. PRehse (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Denise Mercedes[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Denise Mercedes, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Praxidicae (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest[edit]

Hello, Aherron76. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 19:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 19:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aherron76 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I deserve to be unblocked because this block was handed down 8 months ago when I was still learning the platform. i formally did some charity work with a subject i was writing about, at the time i didn't know this was a conflict of interest. Since then i have come to understand the rules of wikipedia and how the platform is to be used and not used. I was not advertising the subject at all since the subject already has been featured in numerous articles and has a pretty large following as is. I simply thought when people do good things especially in the area she was reaching into then they should be reconignized for it. There are numerous resources for teh subject i was writing about and when you google the subject name they are easily enough accessible. Since this is the case i believe i should be unblocked and allowed to contribute to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You seem to think it is impossible to violate WP:PROMO if the subject is widely known. That's obviously false. And come on, you surely knew it was a conflict of interest. How could you not know that? And your contributions were entirely unsuitable for Wikipedia anyway, for multiple reasons. Wikipedia isn't the place to recognise people, that's fundamentally not what Wikipedia is about. As you don't seem to understand Wikipedia at all, I can't lift the block at this time. Yamla (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What subjects do you want to write about, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking[edit]

I would love to contribute to history subjects and main as it pertains to the history of unions as I don’t think enough information is out there. I am also interested in contributing to movements that are just starting. Aherron76 (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]