User talk:Ahmedfalah7711

February 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 10:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Conversion of non-Islamic places of worship into mosques. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Thankyou Kautilya, It is not my preferred vision i have stated the citations and reports. Those are the solid proof of my stated contribution please take out some time and read them. Thankyou[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 11:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Amit Shah; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
There is already a discussion regarding Shah's religious background. Discuss in talk and gain consensus first instead of edit warring. And who uses Quora? Read WP:RS Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have stated the very information what quora is which is a similar platform to stackexchange regarding the authenticity of the answer i have shared you one more authentic website link. Please share the document stating he was born in HINDU VIASHNAV family.

Check the sources you deleted in your edits, for starters. In this source, Shah himself says "I Am A Hindu Vaishnav, Not Jain". Self-identifications like this seals the deal, when it comes to Wikipedia. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Shashank5988 (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your concern but lets contribute to the rightful information, I have been doing this since a while and i know i am doing it right way. I have cited the source and mentioned the reference. Please follow edit rules otherwise you may be banned from further edits and page might freezes.

You are on the verge of getting blocked for your continued brainless edit warring on Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh. It is not other way around. Shashank5988 (talk) 09:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Came to share note, but I see the user has already been warned. --Jaydayal (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite the sufficient sources before doing brainless edits. I have cited my source before doing the edit, please continue talk on talk page before moving on and doing edits

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ahmedfalah7711 reported by User:Jaydayal (Result: ). Thank you. Jaydayal (talk) 09:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. SovalValtos (talk) 13:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note When the current block expires, you are welcome to discuss your issues with the citation on the article talkpage but if you repeat your disruptive edits without establishing consensus, you will be topic-banned from this subject area. Abecedare (talk) 14:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]