User talk:Ahmedsami1406h

In The Name of ALLAH

September 2016[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for reply, I think that this sentence is neutral and not from my own analysis, where is my analysis in this sentence, "But this does not mean that these accusations are true until determined by the courts." ? please tell me and thank you -- Ahmed Sami AlBassiouni (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss on talk:Adnan Oktar. See wp:BRD as to why. Jim1138 (talk) 00:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adnan Oktar. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 00:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Adnan Oktar, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 03:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adnan Oktar.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Adnan Oktar was changed by Ahmedsami1406h (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87958 on 2016-09-30T03:48:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Oktar[edit]

All accusations listed in the article can not be listed until determined by the courts, because any one can accuse anyone. If I accused someone, that does not mean that people can say that he is a criminal. that is not fair. It is neutral and fair to add this sentence to the listed accusations "But this does not mean that these accusations are true until determined by the courts." -- Ahmed Sami AlBassiouni (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I will stop working on wikipedia because there are accusations and aspersions about Muslim scientists like Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar) and I tried to add this sentence "But this does not mean that these accusations are true until determined by the courts." and this is the neutral and fair but I was blocked for two days and my edit was ignored. This is not neutralism. And this is not fairness. So, mostly, I will stop working on wikipedia Insha'ALLAH. -- Ahmed Sami AlBassiouni (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Adnan Oktar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Adnan Oktar was changed by Ahmedsami1406h (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854559 on 2016-10-05T22:43:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:43, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. DMacks (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why Some people are misreported and when someone want to say neutral word, he is blocked. Is that an intentionally misreporting about Adnan Oktar or what? -- Ahmed Sami AlBassiouni (talk) 03:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are not welcome to edit-war, regardless of what your article-content concern is. And while you're blocked, you are not permitted to continue article-content discussion. Edit-warring is a behavioral problem, not based on article content, and it won't lead to your article content idea getting heard or considered. DMacks (talk) 07:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

People who say fabrications abuse themselves before they abuse the people who are misreported. -- Ahmed Sami AlBassiouni (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adnan Oktar. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You know how this will end up, you've been down that road before and it didn't succeed. DMacks (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The truth is more valuable than wikipedia account. -- Ahmed Sami AlBassiouni (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That comment, coupled with your incessant edit-warring, has led me to conclude we don't need your services here any longer. I have blocked you indefintely. DMacks (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I wish you a good day. I am not angry but I wish you to be neutral and fair. Truth is more important than any rules of wikipedia. -- Ahmed Sami AlBassiouni (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]