User talk:Airmid Institute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Airmid Institute, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Airmid Institute, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 10:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Airmid Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 10:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Deb (talk) 11:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-spamun|Dr. Kelly M. Ablard|In compliance with Wikipedia's Paid-contribution disclosure requirement, I would like to clearly state that I will not be receiving any form of compensation for my contributions to Wikipedia. My participation is entirely voluntary, driven by a genuine interest and commitment to the topics at hand.Over the past decade, my work has been recognized in the fields of aromatherapy and conservation. This experience has equipped me with a wealth of knowledge that I believe can significantly contribute to the accuracy and depth of Wikipedia's content in these areas. I fully understand and acknowledge the reasons behind the block on the Airmid Institute account. It was a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy, as the account represented an organization rather than an individual. This experience has been a valuable lesson in the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's community norms and guidelines. It will not happen again. Moving forward, my contributions will be solely as an individual. I intend to focus on writing and editing articles, particularly those related to plant conservation, drawing on my extensive experience and expertise in this field. Additionally, I look forward to engaging in community discussions, bringing a knowledgeable perspective to conversations about plant conservation and related environmental issues. My involvement will be in strict accordance with Wikipedia’s principles of neutrality, verifiability, and no original research, ensuring my contributions are both valuable and compliant with the platform's standards. Thank you for your consideration.}} Airmid Institute (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]