December 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abu Talib ibn Abdul-Muttalib has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abu Talib ibn Abdul-Muttalib was changed by Ajani Abbasali (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968368 on 2014-12-24T18:06:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Abu Talib ibn Abdul-Muttalib[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Abu Talib ibn Abdul-Muttalib, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ajani Abbasali, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Ajani Abbasali! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your question[edit]

Greetings. You recently left a question on my talk page here: User_talk:MadScientistX11#The_Noor_Of_HAZRAT_ABU_TALIB_.28AS.29 I'm guessing you picked me because I'm a teahouse host. FYI, you can ask general questions in the teahouse using this link: Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions and then use the Ask a Question feature. Regarding your changes to Abu_Talib_ibn_Abdul-Muttalib I can't really give you much feedback I'm afraid. I know very little about Islam or Arab culture. The way Wikipedia works is there is almost no hierarchy here. For the most part no editor has any more authority than any other editor. Also, who an editor is doesn't really matter. Whether you have a PhD or some other credentials on some topic is mostly irrelevant. What matters are the arguments you can make and the references you can site. Arguments are mostly made by appealing to wikipedia:policies and also just common sense. The place where people have discussions is on the talk page for the specific article. So in this case the talk page for the article in question is here: Talk:Abu_Talib_ibn_Abdul-Muttalib If someone reverted an edit you made to that article the place to raise the issue is on that talk page. You can also contact the specific editor directly via their talk page as you did with me. However, in most cases it is best to start on the article talk page. The reason is there may be other editors who want to comment and you will be more likely to involve them in the discussion by raising the issue on the article talk page. Keep in mind that discussions can be emotional and can at times require a fairly detailed understanding of Wikipedia policies. My advise for a new editor is to start by editing some non-controversial pages first then once you get the feel for Wikipedia attempt some more controversial articles. Remember that just saying "I know X is true" counts for absolutely nothing. Did you ever watch Law and Order? Jack McCoy had a rule: "I only know what I can prove in court" on Wikipedia we have a similar rule: we only know what can be validated in good references. Here are some other overview articles to get you started: wp:five pillars wp:42 wp:referencing for beginners Hope that helps. Feel free to reply back if you have more questions. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions are poorly written to the point of being unencyclopedic. Some competence is required for editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 04:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

If you have added information to an article and have been reverted then you should take your concerns to the article's talk page in an attempt to gain a consensus. Do not edit war on the article or on another editor's talk page, since you can be blocked and/or banned from such actions. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Faizan[edit]

Regards,

I am not able to locate your message.

Regards

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]