User talk:Ajaxrocks

Ajaxrocks, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Ajaxrocks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@Navops47:. You need to read WP:BLANKING. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Jeneral28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 14:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajaxrocks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All my edits from the start are enclycopedic and have improved99% of the articles. I have added new information which other established users and adminstrators have accepted. Inasmuch as I may or maynot belong to the previous accounts, it is extremely unfair to first block me indefinitely and two revert establish and well source and encyclopedic facts. If you just revert because of your policy, then those articles are outdated and not informative at all. Check with users such as User:Dormskirk and User:Noclador. Request only a temporary block of 1-2 months.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. It is completely irrelevant whether or not your edits have improved articles. You must address only the abuse of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ajaxrocks (talk) 08:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]