User talk:Ak220

Hi there! I saw you redid your changes to the Girls Preparatory School page, I'm glad to see you standing by your feelings and making things known! I think it needs citations, they ask if you contribute that it has citations to show where you received your information from so others know it's valid and supported. It'll also help us take away the citation issue that Wikipedia has issued an article you and I both seemed to be interested and invested in. All the best! Annalyssa y (talk) 22:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Agree. Though the topic be unpleasant to some, it can be introduced into the article, if properly supported by secondary sources. If you are basing your information on "public record", that would be a primary source, and for this venue would amount to original research, WP:OR. Unless something has been published on the subject locally, you will probably be reverted due to lack of citation support. That is one reason these articles don't make a very good "soap-box," though your cause be just. Might have to try the lical op-ed page instead. Rags (talk) 00:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Public record-- and any primary source-- is not original research. That is simply incorrect.