User talk:Akashkumar39

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Akashkumar39, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Sidhu Moose Wala, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Abraham filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain hello, please tell me how to provide a source. Akashkumar39 (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly have a look at referencing for beginners. Also remember that whatever content you want to add on Wikipedia articles has to be verifiable, which means that reliable sources must be able to support the material. Please read: WP:VERIFY, WP:RELIABLE, WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:RSP. ManaliJain (talk) 05:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot must have started[edit]

Hello, Akashkumar39. Please note that you need to add a source which says shooting has started before adding in filmography table. This is mandatory requirement per WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Without shooting, there's no guarantee that this film will ever be made. Mere announcement is not sufficient. Regards -- Ab207 (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207 Thanks, Ab207 Akashkumar39 (talk) 23:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Are you Akashy Kumar? If you are, please verify your identity by emailing our volunteer response team at info-en@wikimedia.org. Do not send copies of identity documents to anyone, they will discuss with you how you can verify your identity. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pulkit Samrat, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生 Ok i putt a source Akashkumar39 (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Akashkumar39! Your additions to Kali Jotta (2023 film) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Draft:Bhool Bhulaiyaa (film series). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Runway 34, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Akashkumar39, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Akashkumar39|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 09:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea I am not a paid user. It is hobby to contribute Wikipedia. Akashkumar39 (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akashkumar39, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as ItsTimes (talk · contribs) and Tousif.15 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

You also say above that you have been blocked, but this account have never been blocked. bonadea contributions talk 09:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea "User:ItsTimes" is my second account but "User:Tousif.15 is not my account. I have only two accounts "Akashkumar39 and ItsTimes".

I am just 15 years old (born. 01 Sep 2007).

Akashkumar39: It is my first and main account, on this I like to writing articles, Updating articles, remove informations without references, fixing tables and give a new update about the article. This account I used on my smartphone 's Wikipedia application.

ItsTimes: It is my second account, I use this only for Creating drafts, Moving articles (with Article Creation Wizard) for draft to main and uploading images (with File Upload Wizard).

Tousif.15: I don't know who is this, you may contact with this user to know that who is he.

For any mistake I made on Wikipedia please tell me...about.

Thanks. Akashkumar39 (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pushpa 2: The Rule (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pushpa 2: The Rule and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akashkumar39! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Bloody Daddy[edit]

Hello Akashkumar39. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Bloody Daddy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please see WP:NOTCSD #16. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 01:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Kidd[edit]

Hello, Akashkumar39. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Kidd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah episodes[edit]

Hello, Akashkumar39. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah episodes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Kidd[edit]

Hello, Akashkumar39. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Kidd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]