User talk:Akaspo
September 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Battle of Badgam—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Battle of Batapur, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. NotAGenious (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Operation Dwarka, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Batapur[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Battle of Batapur, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Night Watch (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
References[edit]
Please see WP:REFB or ask at the Teahouse for help with references. First Battle Of Hilli does not cite any sources and will be draftified soon if the issue is not fixed. Creating references isn't the easiest thing to do, but once you have the hang of it it will go more smoothly. Use the "cite" button in the VisualEditor, do not just type numbers in square brackets like this: [1]. Proper references should look like this: [1] Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 21:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ This is an example.
First Battle Of Hilli moved to draftspace[edit]
Thanks for your contributions to First Battle Of Hilli. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 21:46, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 1958 East Pakistan–India border skirmish[edit]
Hello, Akaspo,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ibjaja055 and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 1958 East Pakistan–India border skirmish, for deletion, because [consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Ibjaja055 (talk) 19:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Unblock request[edit]
Akaspo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The reason was abusing multiple accounts but as seen from my location I'm in the UK, so that can’t be possible. The articles I have have added were battles that actually happened. I use neutral sources and i have not been using 'pro-pakistani nationalist sources'. I use whats in the references thus adding it on the article.
Decline reason:
Where you are has no impact whatsoever on your ability to use multiple accounts. We have blocked many British editors for that and, regrettably, we will probably be blocking many more. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Akaspo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey Daniel Case, I don't think you know but i was banned for abusing alts. The thing is, this is my only account and the location of the other account is not from the uk, whereas im based in the uk. This is my only account and i am not a sock puppet of Pr0pulsion 123. I believe i have done nothing wrong and all articles i upload i back them with sufficient sources. Thank you. Akaspo (talk) 15:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Perhaps you are a meat puppet then, but you don't adequately address this matter. 331dot (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Akaspo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hey 331dot, I took my references and sources from the military history wiki, not from Altay74. I did not coordinate with altay or propulsion. I have not been meat pupetting and I use neutral sources and do not intend to spread propaganda or coordinating with anyone. Please review my block as I have done nothing wrong and I do not have another account plus, I'm not here to spread any nationalism of some sort. Thank you. Akaspo (talk) 21:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. UtherSRG (talk) 14:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Akaspo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, i would like to be unblocked as now i have acknowledged my mistakes and won't do it again if given a second chance. I apologise for my actions and hope to be given a second chance as i have now reflected on my actions. Thanks.
Decline reason:
I don't see where you acknowledged your abuse of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Akaspo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I am writing to request that my block be lifted. I believe I was blocked for abusing multiple accounts, but I assure you that I have not been doing so. As you can see from my location, I am currently in the UK, which makes it impossible for me to be using multiple accounts. I do not know who Pr0pulsion 123 is, nor am I from the same location as them. I understand the reasons that led to my block, and I assure you that I will not engage in any behavior that could cause disruption. As for meat puppetry, I have cut off all ties with Altay74, and Pr0pulsion 123 did not respond. I have acknowledged that I have made a mistake and I will make sure I never meat puppet of any sort again. My passion is to create articles, and I will make an effort to continue doing so. If I have been blocked for spreading incorrect information, I apologize for my mistake, and I will ensure that it doesn't happen again. I have waited and now take full responsibility for my actions and seek a second chance. I will prove myself useful and make positive contributions to Wikipedia unlike before. Thank you for your time and consideration. Akaspo (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
CheckUser confirmed as per below. Adjusting block to remove talk page access following this fifth unblock request. Daniel (talk) 19:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Confirmed to Propolar, 
Likely to Repolar. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)