User talk:Alanna the Brave/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Your GA nomination of Maria E. Beasley
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maria E. Beasley you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Maria E. Beasley
The article Maria E. Beasley you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Maria E. Beasley for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Maria E. Beasley
The article Maria E. Beasley you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Maria E. Beasley for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Maria E. Beasley
On 23 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria E. Beasley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that between 1878 and 1898, American inventor Maria E. Beasley patented a footwarmer, an improved life raft, several barrel-making machines and an anti-derailment device for trains? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria E. Beasley. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Maria E. Beasley), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Perkins book
Send me an email and I will return a PDF copy of the Perkins book the Library of Congress sent me this morning.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May Women in Red events
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
|
The Invisible Barnstar | |
| For reviewing at least 3 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC) |
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Eleanor Glanville
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eleanor Glanville you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Eleanor Glanville
The article Eleanor Glanville you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eleanor Glanville for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Many thanks Gerda Arendt! Alanna the Brave (talk) 20:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Eleanor Glanville
On 25 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eleanor Glanville, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 17th-century entomologist Eleanor Glanville raised her own moths and butterflies, and wrote some of the earliest detailed descriptions of butterfly rearing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eleanor Glanville. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eleanor Glanville), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Dahomey Amazons
Hello, I've been following Dahomey Amazons lately due to working on The Woman King. It looks like you worked on this article around 2018-2019. Not sure if you're still interested in the topic, but it will likely become more popular with the release of the film. I've made a couple of edits to improve it but wanted to see if you see any further edits that could be made. Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 19:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Women in Green October 2022 Good Article Editathon
Hello Alanna the Brave:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn (talk) 23 September 2022
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
GA Editathon
I'm interested in participating, but I'm not a member of the Women in Green WikiProject. Am I disqualified? I'm relatively new, so I'd need some information to start. The first thing I can think of is finding out if the article I've chosen to work on is/has been a GA before. Would that disqualify it? -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Pete Best Beatles! I'm glad you're interested in participating, and yes, you may sign up for the event even though you're not a member of WikiProject Women in Green. You cannot choose to work on an article that is currently a GA article, but if your chosen article used to have GA status but was delisted, then it's a perfectly acceptable candidate, as it likely needs improvements of some kind now. You can confirm whether your chosen article is currently a GA article by looking for the Good Article symbol (a green plus sign) in the upper righthand corner, or by checking its talk page for more info. Let me know if you have any other questions. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- My first question is about choice of article to focus on. I selfishly hope I can choose the article, and from my list to boot. Also, I'm not afraid of hard work, but I don't want to devote a month of work to a project that probably wouldn't achieve GA status, for reasons I don't know about. I have my list of articles (none of which had a green plus sign that I could see) in preferred order, but your project might prioritize that list differently, and I'd want to take that into account. Finally, do multiple people ever end up working on the same article, a la an edit conflict? Do people cooperate on an article? If it's first come, first served I'd hate to take an important article and then botch it as a newbie (you could check out my User page to see if you think I have the chops). The articles that interest me would be Riot grrrl first, followed by Patti Smith, Lucinda Williams and Kathleen Hanna (all tied for second place), with Joan Jett receiving the consolation prize. Are these good choices to begin with? Don't worry, I'll have more questions after I nail down a topic, but for now I'll do my homework and read the Good articles article. -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 22:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Pete Best Beatles: All good questions. Here's what I think: you can pick any topic about women or women's works for this event, but because you're just learning about the GA nomination process, you may want to choose a smaller, less hefty article to start with than the choices you've just listed. Riot grrrl, Lucinda Williams, Kathleen Hanna and the others all have enormous articles, and any one of those could translate into a huge amount of work (one of the first steps toward a GA nomination usually involves checking every existing citation/source in the article for accuracy, and that takes a long time for larger Wikipedia articles). You can totally collaborate with another editor on an article -- feel free to ask someone, or post to the Women in Green event talk page to see if you can find a partner. During October, once you've started working on your chosen article for the event, you can also request a "mini-review", and an experienced Women in Green editor will take a look and tell you if your project still has any major issues that need addressing. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- If we're allowed to do bands, I'd love to do Bikini Kill - it's shorter (23 references) and well within my purview (it was Kathleen Hanna's riot grrrl band). -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 03:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Pete Best Beatles: That looks like a great choice! Alanna the Brave (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- I know I'm late to the game, buy I looked at all the references in my GA article to be Bikini Kill today, and out of twenty-three references, I have problems with or questions about twelve of them. Is there someone or a place where I can spell these issues out and get some advice on how to proceed? -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Pete Best Beatles: If you're wondering whether the article's sources are considered reliable, I would suggest checking the perennial sources list (and its archives) to see if there's any consensus from Wikipedia editors, or by starting a new discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Alternatively, if you have specific questions about GA sourcing/referencing, you can also pose those questions at the Women in Green Editathon talk page and see if other participants have advice. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 15:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- I know I'm late to the game, buy I looked at all the references in my GA article to be Bikini Kill today, and out of twenty-three references, I have problems with or questions about twelve of them. Is there someone or a place where I can spell these issues out and get some advice on how to proceed? -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Pete Best Beatles: That looks like a great choice! Alanna the Brave (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- If we're allowed to do bands, I'd love to do Bikini Kill - it's shorter (23 references) and well within my purview (it was Kathleen Hanna's riot grrrl band). -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 03:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Pete Best Beatles: All good questions. Here's what I think: you can pick any topic about women or women's works for this event, but because you're just learning about the GA nomination process, you may want to choose a smaller, less hefty article to start with than the choices you've just listed. Riot grrrl, Lucinda Williams, Kathleen Hanna and the others all have enormous articles, and any one of those could translate into a huge amount of work (one of the first steps toward a GA nomination usually involves checking every existing citation/source in the article for accuracy, and that takes a long time for larger Wikipedia articles). You can totally collaborate with another editor on an article -- feel free to ask someone, or post to the Women in Green event talk page to see if you can find a partner. During October, once you've started working on your chosen article for the event, you can also request a "mini-review", and an experienced Women in Green editor will take a look and tell you if your project still has any major issues that need addressing. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- My first question is about choice of article to focus on. I selfishly hope I can choose the article, and from my list to boot. Also, I'm not afraid of hard work, but I don't want to devote a month of work to a project that probably wouldn't achieve GA status, for reasons I don't know about. I have my list of articles (none of which had a green plus sign that I could see) in preferred order, but your project might prioritize that list differently, and I'd want to take that into account. Finally, do multiple people ever end up working on the same article, a la an edit conflict? Do people cooperate on an article? If it's first come, first served I'd hate to take an important article and then botch it as a newbie (you could check out my User page to see if you think I have the chops). The articles that interest me would be Riot grrrl first, followed by Patti Smith, Lucinda Williams and Kathleen Hanna (all tied for second place), with Joan Jett receiving the consolation prize. Are these good choices to begin with? Don't worry, I'll have more questions after I nail down a topic, but for now I'll do my homework and read the Good articles article. -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 22:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September drive bling
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Alanna the Brave for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Rajani Pandit
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rajani Pandit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 08:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rajani Pandit
The article Rajani Pandit you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rajani Pandit for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 08:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rajani Pandit
The article Rajani Pandit you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rajani Pandit for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
GA assessment (an earnest entreaty)
Thanks for your help with the Bikini Kill assessment. Obviously, I can't do all that work in one evening (the fault is obviously all mine), but I'm committed to completing the task. I've added another GA assessment request to the top of the list...I implore you to assess it also, so I can work on it in the near future also. If you can't leave the information on that page, let me know where it is, or leave the assessment on my talk page. This article is within my bailiwick - I've made some minor edits to it in the past. Thanks in advance, Pete Best Beatles (talk) 01:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Pete Best Beatles: I'm glad you found the Bikini Kill assessment helpful! Don't worry about not being able to do all the work at once -- you can take your time. Unfortunately, I can't complete another article assessment at this time, as your request was technically posted after October 31 (UTC) and I've got too much else on my plate this week. The 20-minute assessment requests are now closed until our next editathon event. I encourage you to keep improving Bikini Kill, and if you have any other questions about the GA process, you're welcome to post them to the main WikiProject Women in Green talk page. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 12:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Help with article about former Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan
I noticed you’re a member of the Women in Red Wikiproject. I thought you might be interested in a proposal to update the article about former Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan Talk:Jenny Durkan#Proposals September 2022. I have a conflict of interest, since I have a personal connection to Durkan. Would you have time to do a review? 1920sportsfan (talk) 20:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
|
Editor of the Week | |
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Thebiguglyalien submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- I nominate Alanna the Brave to be Editor of the Week for her incredible work at Women in Green. She's been involved with Women in Green for years, and she deserves much of the credit for making it into what it is today. It is her attention to the project that has kept is alive and growing. Her initiative in organizing project editathons has inspired a huge influx of high quality contributions while accommodating new and inexperienced editors, and the October 2022 Wildcard Edition Editathon has been the most successful yet. This is to say nothing of the work that she has done in content contributions of her own, having created and substantially improved dozens of articles about notable women.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
|
|
|
| Alanna_the_Brave |
| Editor of the Week for the week beginning December 11, 2022 |
| She deserves much of the credit for her incredible work at Women in Green, making it into what it is today. Her attention to the project has kept it alive and growing. Her initiative in organizing project editathons has inspired a huge influx of high quality contributions while accommodating new and inexperienced editors. |
| Recognized for |
| creating and substantially improving dozens of articles about notable women |
| Notable work |
| October 2022 Wildcard Edition Editathon |
| Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 15:26, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh wow -- thanks Buster7! And thank you for your very kind nomination, Thebiguglyalien. :-) I've really enjoyed my work with Women in Green over the past few years, and I appreciate the nod. I'll keep an eye out for other possible nominees in 2023. Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Peace Dove Christmas
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year, Alanna the Brave!
Alanna the Brave,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.