User talk:AlbertEinstein1939

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is my talk page. If messages are private, email me at kennedyeric84@gmail.com. If there is severe vandalism, this page may be protected.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AlbertEinstein1939, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yworo (talk) 18:45, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AlbertEinstein1939, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi AlbertEinstein1939! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Era style at Roman Empire[edit]

Please review WP:ERA. Your personal religious beliefs are not a reason to change the era style in an article about the Roman Empire. Some people are unaware of the guidelines on era usage, so thanks in advance for taking a look at the link. Cynwolfe (talk) 12:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Super tuber (disambiguation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Theopolisme 02:08, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - SpinningSpark 10:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you because a high percentage of your edits are not constructive to building an encyclopeadia. Any one of them might have been taken as a new editor finding their feet, but taken together they look like a long term pattern of disruption. Amongst the specific reasons for blocking are;

  • Creation of Super tuber (disambiguation), an apparent joke page
  • Creation of the redirect cupper based on entirely false information and spreading that disruption over three pages. (The original dab page has now been restored)
  • Gratuitous changing of date formats - a known controversial issue
  • This joke edit to Rabbit
  • Your habit of not replying to warnings and criticisms, but simply deleting them off your talk page (eg [1]) while not disallowed, is worrying.
  • The fact that your home IP address appears to be blocked, or was blocked, is worrying and raises concerns of sockpuppetry.

That is quite a list for a user with only 50 edits, so sorry, we can no longer assume good faith with you. SpinningSpark 11:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlbertEinstein1939 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am so sorry, and I understand that I abused Wikipedia for a long time. I promise to make more useful contributions. AlbertEinstein1939 (talk) 01:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sockpuppet. Please appeal your blocks from your main account. Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Super tuber" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Super tuber. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 20#Super tuber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]