User talk:Aldrige95

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aldrige95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only ever edited pages legitimately with this one account, but was inexplicably blocked for using "multiple accounts". Clearly, this is untrue, and this block should be reversed. Aldrige95 (talk) 03:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence appears not to support your claim. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Aldrige95, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 10:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aldrige95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account has been blocked for a significant amount of time now. I apologize for any editing issues that may have been made in the past, as this account was once shared with other individuals. It is now only controlled by one person, and I request removal of the block for both the account and IP as I wish to provide meaningful and reliable contributions to existing Wikipedia pages to benefit the entire community. Thank you for your consideration.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. No response to the question below. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you Smoore95GAGA or not? What is your relation to that user? Vanjagenije (talk) 01:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aldrige95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not "Smoore95GAGA" and I do not know who that user is. I request that I be unblocked because I wish to contribute to Wikipedia again by making meaningful and productive edits to pages. I apologize for the delay in response, but I would still like to be considered for unblocking. Thank you for your help. Aldrige95 (talk) 19:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The behavioural evidence indicates the sockpuppetry block is warranted. Huon (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aldrige95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you please elaborate on "behavioural evidence"? My account is being penalized for the actions of a completely unrelated account, and this has been an ongoing issue for months. All I ask is that my account, which has been my account for months now, be allowed to edit again. Keep the "Smoore95GAGA" account blocked, as I have no idea who that is. I would just like to use my account again, as it was blocked for no valid reason relating to anything I have ever done. Aldrige95 (talk) 23:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account was blocked by a Checkuser based on substantial evidence that you are the same person. Please direct further unblock requests to WP:UTRS. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 15:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2017[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 15:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]