User talk:Alexander Iskandar/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Speedy deletion nomination of Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election

A tag has been placed on Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not appropriate, per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NPOLITICIAN

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 01:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Separate articles for parties contesting the Sarawak 2016 election

Hi Alexander Iskandar, you have created several separate articles for parties contesting the Sarawak state elections, I feel these articles are unnecessary as we already have the election tables give out the right amount of information - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election,State Reform Party candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election. Rather than that we should just use the election results tables as it show who is contesting which seat and from which party. Anyway if you look at those articles some parties are just contesting less than 10 seats, that is insignificant or just overkill in my opinion.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)in

@Lazybugger13: What is your opinion about this article --> Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta candidates, 2012 Alberta provincial election and all party's election candidates pages in this category --> Category:Alberta general election, 2012. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Alexander Iskandar, again the article which you used Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta candidates, 2012 Alberta provincial election has that party contesting in closed to 50 seats, whereas in Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru and State Reform Party you have them contesting just 5 and 11 seats respectively out of 82 seats. Maybe you should merge them, with say Amanah or PAS. Either make an entire new article to combine Amanah, PAS, Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru and STAR together.Lazybugger13 (talk) 06:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

I suggest that we should let it be until the 11th Sarawak state election ended.. Then, after that we can merge all those party's election candidates pages into Candidates of the 2016 Sarawak state election. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 06:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarawak People's Energy Party logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarawak People's Energy Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Election Results Sarawak 2016

Hi Alexander Iskandar, I have seen that you have created a new template - . That is fine if you wish to create individual templates for each state constituency. That is a lot of work in my opinion. But for the election results we should keep the election results table as it is following what was used Sarawak_state_election,_2011 and update it from there when the election results come it. In the meantime I have hidden both election results tables until the results come in.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

We should change the way we update the election result. We should update election result by constituency one by one in each state constituency article. The readers able to compare the recent election result with past election result in respective constituency.. For example, if readers (especially Opar voters) curious to know the recent result of his constituency, he/she may go to this article --> Opar (state constituency), they can compare with previous election result of Opar. I find it more effective and straight forward. What is your opinion about this? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you can check each constituency article for comparison if you like but creating a different election article for each state constituency is a lot of work. If we have all the election results information in one table for the entire state, that is also fine. You can go ahead and create those state constituency results tables, but leave the election results tables alone and don't delete it. Thank you.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

@Lazybugger13: Win-win situation.. I let you update the election result in one table in the Sarawak state election, 2016. I just found from your talk page that you contribute a lot about Malaysian election-related pages and templates. I really appreciate about your passion to make something better about Malaysian election-related pages and templates.. We really need to have a good co-operation in this matter. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

@Lazybugger13: Do you think it is a good idea to create WikiProject about Malaysian elections, Malaysian politics, Malaysian governments, Malaysian legislatures, Malaysian legislations?? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Alexander Iskandar, it is a good idea if you would like to create a WikiProject just for Malaysian elections. Its always best to head to the WikiProject Malaysia and get feedback and see if there are any editors who will volunteer and help with the project.Lazybugger13 (talk) 06:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

I don't know why WikiProject Malaysia seems not really active as expected. Maybe, Wikipedia visitors from Malaysia don't really bother to contribute something in this Wikipedia and only be a silent reader and use Wikipedia as their one-stop centre to look for academic references. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Pardon me for butting in here, but can I try to contribute with only the hexagons of the Sarawak seats?

If you have no idea what I'm talking about, here's a reference. Hytar (talk) 23:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@Hytar:. Sounds interesting. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 02:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Anyway I'm now rearranging the hexagons, since they have new seats. That will take a while... Hytar (talk) 22:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bayan Baru (disambiguation)

The article Bayan Baru (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary as this seems to be a case of WP:TWODABS, where a hatnote at the Bayan Baru page serves as disambiguation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  04:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Turning it into a redirect seems like a reasonable solution.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  05:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

@Insertcleverphrasehere:.. Thanks for letting me know about WP:TWODABS policy. Hopefully, bots and other users will differentiate between Malaysian administrative district and Malaysian constituency when they want to insert internal link. I will left to bots or other users to correct the internal links issue, e.g. Gombak District and Gombak (federal constituency) will be linked properly in the related articles. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 05:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Please don't create redirects with "(disambiguation)" in the title that do not target disambiguation pages. Such redirects should only be created for intentional links to disambiguation pages. older ≠ wiser 10:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	i noticed you make alot of pages on Malaysian federal constituencies. Good job — Etimena 13:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

I created this page just for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Defunct_Federal_Constituencies_of_Malaysia

@Etimena:. For your information, the defunct federal constituencies of Malaysia article --> List of former Malaysian federal electoral districts already created. By the way, thanks for your Barnstar. :) Alexander Iskandar (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation for parliamentary elections and federal constituencies

Hi Alexander Iskandar, I see you have created numerous articles for federal constituencies - Sungai Besar (federal constituency), Kuala Kangsar (federal constituency) and have added templates to numerous election articles - Permatang Pauh by-election, 2015, Rompin by-election, 2015; suggesting for a merger. The by-elections articles should stay as they are they are political articles and should not be merged and the templates should be removed. While I commend you for creating the various federal constituency articles, you should slowly include links to towns in the constituencies, demographics, transportation, economy, culture and geography. Plus you need to included direct references for these articles for the various subjects. You might need help in getting WP:MALAYSIA guys to help out. In the meantime I have created two new election articles for the 2 upcoming by-elections- Kuala Kangsar by-election, 2016 and Sungai Besar by-election, 2016.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interpretation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Siblings of Prime Ministers of Malaysia has been nominated for discussion

Category:Siblings of Prime Ministers of Malaysia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Orders of precedence

Salam/Greeting. If you want to review articles related to orders of precedence, please don't delete the table and make a straight list. It makes the order of precedence more organised and convenient for everyone to read. Aamuizz (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Orders, decorations, and medals of Sarawak page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abdul Malek Yusuf

added a link pointing to Rembau

Sulaiman Ninam Shah

added a link pointing to Muar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Malaysian comedy horror films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Malaysian comedy horror films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Voting age page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Dangerous Drugs Act 1952. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Telemedicine Act

The infobox says both:not yet in force and Given Royal assent. These two seem contradictory. Additionally, the informatio ngiven is a mere firectory entry; it needs some morei nformation, and especially on whether it has been amended or whatever since 197. This is almost 20 years later. DGG ( talk ) 14:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Action Party leadership election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fernandez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Najib Razak Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah.png

Thank you for uploading File:Najib Razak Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Pointless headings

Please don't start another edit war. There is no point in having a "State Assemblies" heading in an article solely about State Assembly results. Why do you think it should be included? Number 57 21:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Malaysian constituency pages

Thank you for your amazing articles created for each Malaysian federal and state constituencies. I express my highest appreciation. Ueutyi (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Ueutyi (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Malaysian general election, 2013 -- Popular Vote Results at State Level

Hi, I noticed you've done a lot of work related to Malaysian elections. In particular, you added popular vote totals for each party in the states of Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan, Terengganu, and Penang to the page Malaysian general election, 2013. If you don't mind, could you share with me the source you got these results from? I have an academic interest in popular vote results at the state level, so I would really appreciate it if you could give me a source so that I can find these results for the rest of the states. Thank you so much! SaltySeas (talk) 03:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Seri Rambai

Hi. I see you've edited the article about George Town recently.

An article I wrote about the Seri Rambai cannon at Fort Cornwallis is now a Featured article candidate; you're welcome to add comments. Singora (talk) 13:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alexander Iskandar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Death date discrepancy at Mubin Sheppard

Hi. I'm just looking into a discrepancy in death date between here and Wikidata at Mubin Sheppard. It look like you changed this from 11 September to 12 September. I can't access the ref to support that (the page you linked to doesn't load), and others say 11 September, so I'll change it back for now - but if it was the 12th September then please feel free to revert it back, but please also change it on Wikidata. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Penal Code (Malaysia) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penal Code (Malaysia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penal Code (Malaysia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Historian (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of National Justice Party leadership election, 2001 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Justice Party leadership election, 2001 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Justice Party leadership election, 2001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 08:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarawak Workers Party candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election

The article Sarawak Workers Party candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No candidates listed, so there is bo useful content. Appears to be an abandoned draft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation (Malaysia)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation (Malaysia), Alexander Iskandar!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Your addition to Johor Bahru City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your addition to Malacca City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Malacca City Council, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your addition to Shah Alam City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 04:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seberang Perai Municipal Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butterworth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Your addition to Kuala Terengganu City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alor Star

A tag has been placed on Category:Alor Star requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 14:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pengurusan Aset Air

The article Pengurusan Aset Air has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No useful information. No references. Does not even say what country.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pengurusan Aset Air for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pengurusan Aset Air is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pengurusan Aset Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

List of African millionaires page move

I think that is controversial. Please get consensus at talk first. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop. Per WP:BRD, please discuss and gain consensus at article talk. Please do not move that article again. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petronas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MISC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Ethnicity is not the same thing as nationality

I don't know why you are changing categories from Category:Lists of people by nationality to Category:Lists of people by ethnicity, but it doesn't seem to be warranted, and I'm not aware of any consensus to do so. Ethnicity and nationality are two different things. I have changed the categories back for the time being. ... discospinster _talk 21:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

List of Canadians

Hi there - on your most recent edit to List of Canadians, your edit summary was, "ethno-national group under ethnicity umbrella". What does that mean? How does it relate to a list of people whose family ethnicities include British, French, Irish, Jewish/Israeli, Japanese, Romanian, Ukrainian, Chinese, Persian, Indian, and that's just the first 10 that I found in the list? "Canadian" is not an ethnicity - we are a mosaic of people from all over the world. PKT(alk) 21:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Do you know what is panethnicity concept about? Panethnic group includes diverse populations who have ancestral origins in many places. Not to be confused with Race (human categorization) concept. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Theoretically, it is possible to group together British Canadian, French Canadian, Irish Canadian as Canadian ethnic group in the United States Census. This applied to Canadian diaspora. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations

Before nominating any more pages for speedy deletion please read WP:CSD. The criteria listed there are the only ones that should be used. I have declined quite a few of your nominations as they don't fall into one of the listed criteria. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 11:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Again, do not nominate any more pages for speedy deletion unless they meet one of the criterion at WP:CSD. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 11:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Reason: A3 No content Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

A3 says it does not apply to redirects. Please read the criterion. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 11:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Zambian Americans redirected to Category:American people of Zambian descent. Is it good redirect? From article mainspace redirect to category? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

R2 does not apply either as it states that cross space namespace from the main space does not apply to redirects to the category space. I am not making any conclusion as to whether this is a good redirect or not, just evaluating of the page is deletable under a speedy deletion criterion. If you think the page should be deleted take it to WP:RFD. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 12:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Move the request

Lin Rong-San → Lin Rong-san --111.71.49.236 (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Is it wrong to use capital S? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

AfD

It's a good idea to provide a rationale for deletion when nominating articles. MB298 (talk) 04:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pengurusan Air Pahang Berhad, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Filipino Americans does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Monegasque billlionaires

A tag has been placed on Category:Monegasque billlionaires requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 18:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

AfD listings

Hey Alexander Iskandar, not sure if it was you, but because you made the AfDs, I'm going to assume it was you. Just a note that when you make an AfD, you don't copy and paste the contents onto the log. You need to transclude the template by doing this:
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omani Americans}}

That puts the AfD onto the page:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Omani Americans

Omani Americans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ethnic group. No reliable or significant coverage. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. What an odd little article, which attests to its own non-notability: "It is certain that Oman has a very small diaspora" -- apparently because of the wonderfulness of staying in Oman. That's fine. No reason at all to have an article though, that I can find. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Sails pretty close to the wind of WP:G11 as an advert for Oman... Cordless Larry (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

If you do this it allows easier access to the page instead of needing to manually find it. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wealth in Palestine

A tag has been placed on Category:Wealth in Palestine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 19:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirection of high school articles

Please stop redirecting high school articles. If you consider that they are not notable please obtain consensus on their talk page or take individually to WP:AFD. Just Chilling (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Also note that in China many "Middle Schools" are in fact secondary schools with senior high school. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dalat International School, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Administrators Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Just Chilling (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

This is unacceptable. Unilaterally redirecting a page is perfectly fine, as it can be easily overturned if contested. But you can't just appoint yourself the one-man notability police and go around rapidly removing large amounts of articles from this project. You're wholly circumventing deletion process and community consensus and essentially making it impossible for every redirection to be contested and discussed per WP:ATD-R due to the sheer volume of redirects you're creating. What makes this even more problematic is that in practice high schools are usually kept as notable, so the argument for redirecting them isn't necessarily even that strong to begin with. This is disruptive, and this is your last warning. You will be blocked if you continue. Swarm ♠ 16:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cluster Schools in Malaysia

A tag has been placed on Category:Cluster Schools in Malaysia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 13:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Moving categories

Hello. You shouldn't move categories other than via the official processes at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy - there may be reasons why a category is named as it is that aren't obvious to you - and doing it the official way is a lot less effort, as there are bots to do all the hard work! Le Deluge (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing and blanking all school articles in Malaysia. its unnecessary, the page has existed for long time and you just blanked it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FarGah1 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

King Edward VII School, Taiping

added links pointing to Joginder Singh and Randhir Singh

Bukit Mertajam High School

added a link pointing to Public school

Maxwell School

added a link pointing to Nelson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

British Council category

Hi Alexander. I saw that you added Refugee Council to Category:British Council, and then noticed that you'd done the same with several other organisations. Unless I'm mistaken, most of them aren't affiliated with the British Council. Could your categorisation have been a mistake? Cordless Larry (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Do you have an explanation for these edits, or should they be reverted? Cordless Larry (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Maybe we should add not to be confused template on the top of page to get rid of confusion. For unfamiliar readers, they may assume British Council have affiliation with British Council for Aid to Refugees. Same case to another "British Council of"-related pages. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

There is already a "main article" link to British Council at the top of the category page, or were you thinking of somewhere else? Cordless Larry (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Actually I edited those pages today. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 16:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Dziaddin Mukarram Shah II of Kedah

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Alexander Iskandar, thanks for creating Dziaddin Mukarram Shah II of Kedah!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding references to reliable sources would improve the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 00:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1953 establishments in North Borneo

A tag has been placed on Category:1953 establishments in North Borneo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 13:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1953 in North Borneo

A tag has been placed on Category:1953 in North Borneo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 13:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Royal house of Selangor

A tag has been placed on Category:Royal house of Selangor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 13:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hospitals in Malacca

A tag has been placed on Category:Hospitals in Malacca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Johor

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Johor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Kedah

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Kedah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Kelantan

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Kelantan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Kuala Lumpur

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Kuala Lumpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Malacca

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Malacca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Negeri Sembilan

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Negeri Sembilan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Pahang

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Pahang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Penang

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Penang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Perak

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Perak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Perlis

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Perlis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Sabah

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Sabah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Selangor

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Selangor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Universities in Terengganu

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Terengganu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 16:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Universities in Sarawak has been nominated for discussion

Category:Universities in Sarawak, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T 16:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for helping redirecting Malaysia school to their respective list. I have been busy doing work in real life so I don't have time to edit them since this RfC. Please also note that there are people reverting your edits such as this. You should probably state why you redirect page in your edit summary by the way. QianCheng虔诚 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Those articles should be redirected to their respective school list until reliable sources are added and it clearly meets WP:NOTE. Interested editors are welcomed to improve those articles by adding reliable sources. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't know why they have time to revert my edits but they don't show their efforts by adding reliable sources. Those pages left unreferenced since many years ago. This is Wikipedia and Wikipedia is a place for encyclopedic content not for trivial, rumours, original research, primary sources. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

category changes

it would be very useful for anyone trying to make any sense of your category changes - to actually add edit summaries, where possible, so that your moving and changes might be understood - as it is, it is difficult in all WP:AGF to understand exactly what you are up to JarrahTree 10:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I am sure you mean well, but it is better to nominate categories for renaming than simply moving them. Example Category:Fula media to Category:Fula-language media, leaves the content in Fula media. Please check out Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Tim! (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Works by Abdul Razak Mohaideen has been nominated for discussion

Category:Works by Abdul Razak Mohaideen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations! You just made Malaysia New Articles too big to be included!

You had made User:AlexNewArtBot/MalaysiaSearchResult so big that WP:MY is currently under Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded. I hope you feel good for yourself. --QianCheng_虔诚 05:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abdul Hamid

added a link pointing to Sultan Abdul Hamid II

Yusof Basiron

added a link pointing to Rembau

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

January 2007 in Oceania

I just noticed that the deletion notice on January 2007 in Oceania points to an altogether different discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2006 in Malaysia and Singapore). There is no actual entry for it that I can find on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Dawnseeker2000 19:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion: January 2007 in Oceania → 2007 in Oceania. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, please stop what you're doing. If what you're wanting is a move discussion, you're not doing it correctly. You've placed deletion notices on at last fifty articles that point to an unrelated deletion discussion (the one that I mentioned above; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2006 in Malaysia and Singapore). If you have a move suggestion for an article, please use the article's talk page and follow the instructions at WP:RM. Dawnseeker2000 19:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

January 200X in Y merged to 200X in Y. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Mudzaffar Shah) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mudzaffar Shah, Alexander Iskandar!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful disambiguation page! In the future, when creating a disambiguation page, do not include the (disambiguation) as part of the page title when the title without the (disambiguation) doesn't exist yet.

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

A7 Speedy deletion of films

Do not nominate any more films for speedy deletion using the A7 criterion. I just went through and declined 11 nominations of films that you made. For an article to be speedy deleted using A7 it must be about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event. If the article is not about one of those five limited areas then it can not be speedy deleted using that criterion. Films are not one of the 5 subject areas that are eligible. If you have any questions please ask. ~ GB fan 10:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

How to nominate any film for speedy deletion? Under what criterion actually? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 10:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

There is no speedy deletion criterion that can be applied to films that do not show a claim to significance. If you do not believe the films are notable you can nominate them for deletion using WP:PROD or WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 11:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Also just declined your two A7 nominations of pages in the Draft namespace. All the speedy deletion criterion that start with A can only be used in the mainspace. They can not be used in the Draft space. If you believe the drafts should be deleted you can nominate them for deletion using WP:MFD. ~ GB fan 11:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

A10 begins with an A, so it does not apply to pages in the Draft namespace. ~ GB fan 11:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Is it possible to move those articles with unreferenced tag or notability issue to Draft namespace? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Without looking at the specific articles you are talking about it is hard to answer the question. ~ GB fan 11:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I see you have added the MFD template to 6 articles but have not completed the nomination process. Click on this WP:MFD#How to list pages for deletion, then click on the "Show" link in the green box. There are three steps listed that you must complete for each one of those MFD nominations. ~ GB fan 11:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Adira

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Adira, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 11:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Is it possible to move Adira to Draft:Adira? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

The article was created in 2011, has over 200 edits made to it. It should not be moved to the Draft space. If you do not believe it meets the notability guidelines nominate it for deletion using WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 12:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nikki (Malaysian singer)

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nikki (Malaysian singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: collaborating with a notable artist indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 12:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ash Nair

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ash Nair, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 12:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nana (deejay)

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nana (deejay), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: regularly writing for a notable newspaper indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 12:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Is it possible to move Nana (deejay) to Draft:Nana (deejay). Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Again, No. This was created in 2006 with well over 100 edits to it. If you feel notability is not there, nominate it at WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 12:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kaer Azami

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kaer Azami, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims coverage in reliable source. Also, after ten years, it should really be taken to WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 11:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Is it possible to move Kaer Azami to Draft:Kaer Azami. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Did you read what SoWhy wrote? The article has been around for over 10 years. Take it to WP:AFD if you feel it should be deleted. ~ GB fan 12:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Riz (singer)

Hello Alexander Iskandar, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Riz (singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 12:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Is it possible to move Riz (singer) to Draft:Riz (singer)? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Answering all of the questions above: Not without consensus. Draftspace is designed to allow page creators to work on it, not to allow admins to bypass the deletion policy. I strongly advise that you familiarize yourself with the relevant policies, especially the speedy deletion policy and the strict and limited scope of WP:CSD#A7. The number of mistakes you have made is staggering for an experienced user. Regards SoWhy 12:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Farah Asyikin Zulkifli

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Farah Asyikin Zulkifli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: significance assumed per WP:SILENCE after 10 years, use WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 12:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

G13 nominations

Please read the documentation on Template:Db-g13. It explains how to manually nominate a Draft for deletion using G-13. ~ GB fan 12:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:TVBS Media Inc.

Why did you nominate Draft:TVBS Media Inc. for review? Do you believe it is in shape to move to the mainspace? Or are you trying to get around the fact that G13 only applies to articles with the AFC header? ~ GB fan 12:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ GB fan 14:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

You need to stop moving draft articles around. It is unnecessary. All you are doing is making a bunch of unneeded redirects. ~ GB fan 14:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

User:103.1.70.95‎; 20:16

Have you been using this IP to redirect school articles? Just Chilling (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

No. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Moving Draft Articles

Why are you moving draft articles to other names within the Draft namespace. The name they are at while a draft doesn't matter much. If the name doesn't correspond to the contents of the article then move it. If it isn't located at a draft name that it would be if it ever gets moved to the main space then leave it be. It does not hurt anything and you are just creating a bunch of unneeded redirects. ~ GB fan 13:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

It is necessary to remove honorific from title page. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

It is not necessary to remove the honorific from Drafts. If those were actual articles, then yes, but they aren't articles, they are drafts. Drafts do not need to comply with WP:Title. ~ GB fan 14:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

So how to improve those drafts? Just left those draft title with honorific prefix Dr.? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

If you want to improve the Drafts, look for reliable sources, add the reliable sources with content to the draft. Show that they are notable and then move the drafts to an appropriate article title. The Drafts can sit at the name with the honorific, it doesn't make any difference until they are moved to the mainspace. ~ GB fan 14:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. "Redirects are cheap. Redirects take up minimal disk space and use very little bandwidth. Thus, it doesn't really hurt things if there are a few of them scattered around." Deleting a redirect actually adds very slightly to the size of the database (since deleted pages are not really purged from the database, just hidden from public view). Unless a redirect is actively misleading or gets in the way of a pagemove, there is little point in deleting it. What is your opinion? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes they are cheap, but there is no reason to move draft pages from one name to another. No one is suggesting to delete the redirects. I am saying don't make them for no reason. You are moving things that don't need to be moved and creating unnecessary redirects. Find something productive to do. ~ GB fan 14:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

No reason? Remove honorific from draft title doesn't really hurt things. Draft redirect take up minimal disk space and use very little bandwidth. Is it wrong to rename draft title? I don't request those drafts to be deleted but renamed them without honorific prefix. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

No one said that moving them hurt anything, I said it was unnecessary and creating a bunch of unneeded redirects. It doesn't hurt to have the honorific in the title of the Draft page either. Unless you can show me where it says that draft pages must comply with WP:TITLE, there is no reason to move them. Moving them just makes extra redirects and extra uneeded edits to the pages and is disruptive. ~ GB fan 15:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Extra redirect = cheap redirect?? Tell me how cheap redirect become harmful and uncontrollable. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 15:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I never said they were harmful. I never said they were uncontrollable. I said the moves were unnecessary and they created unneeded redirects. Unless you can point to something that says they should be moved to a new name without the honorifics, don't move them. ~ GB fan 15:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry for the inconvenience to you, GB fan. After arguing with you about moving drafts, I learnt that moving drafts are not same like moving articles. Draft namespace is different from article namespace, so WP:TITLE is not necessarily applied to draft project. I know some drafts only exist temporarily and may be deleted soon due to unencyclopedic content. I also found many drafts left abandoned more than 6 month with no obvious effort by editors to add reliable sources. I decided to just add template db-g13 when possible and let other admins make a decision what to do next. Another problems about drafts will be handled by another enthusiast Wikipedia editors. By the way, sorry for my troublesome behaviours. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

It is OK. ~ GB fan 18:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Am I doing the right action to add template db-g13? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

You are close. Two things. First the criterion has a couple of stipulations. The first thing you have got it right, it must have not been edited in over six months. The second part is where you need to look a little closer. The criterion says "This criterion applies to draft articles in the draft namespace or userspace that are using the project's {{AFC submission}} template." When I saw your question, I went to your contributions and the first one I pulled up was Draft:Dr. David Suzuki Public School Wilderness Reserve. This does not have the template on on it, so it is not eligible for G13 speedy deletion. The other thing you should look at is the something I mentioned earlier. There is an extra parameter in Template:Db-g13. If you click the link, it will take you to the template. The usage section explains how to manually nominate a Draft for deletion using G-13. ~ GB fan 19:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dr. David Suzuki Public School Wilderness Reserve does not have {{AFC submission}} so I learnt that it is not eligible for G13 speedy deletion yet. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

This draft may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a rejected or unsubmitted Articles for Creation page that has not been edited in over six months (excluding bot edits). This applies to all pages that contain an Articles for Creation template, in draft namespace or userspace. See CSD G13. Alexander Iskandar (talk)

What is your opinion about moving Draft:Dr. Peter Aiken to Draft:Peter Aiken? It is done by Dodger67 on 12:43, 4 January 2017‎ (UTC) based on revision history. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 20:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy G13 deletions

First of all, thank you for your editing here. I note that you are nominating some draft articles for G13 speedy deletion, and to date your selection of articles is correct; but your nomination procedure is not. The template, correctly used, shows the date of last edit . To see how to do this, please follow the instructions laid down in template {{db-g13}}.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Further to my previous post, I have now found some drafts that you have nominated too early. The six-month limit may not be shortened for a G13 nomination. Please be more careful. We as admins have enough to do without having unnecessary work created for us.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I have now worked through all of your g13 tags currently on display. I have removed eight as being incorrect; two more I left because they reach the six-month mark within the next 48 hours. the rest - less than one third - I have actioned. Please, if you wish to make these nomib=nations, get the procedure right. The last edit must be no less than 6 months ago, and the article must contain an AfC template.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paul Moss

Hello, I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Paul Moss. This article was discussed at Articles for deletion in 2005 and is therefore permanently ineligible for deletion under the proposed deletion process. I did this for procedural reasons only, and have no comment one way or the other on the merits of the deletion nomination. If you still wish to pursue deletion, please open another AfD discussion. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 00:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Hafiz (Malaysian singer)

You seem to have mistakenly placed a PROD tag on an article which was not eligible. I have removed it and explained why on the talk page. If you still believe that the article is eligible for deletion, you will need to use the WP:AFD procedure, although I personally believe you would be wasting your time. Please read the message I've left you on the article's talk page and readjust your current editing practices. Thank you. — Tuxipεdia^(talk) 08:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Final warning : No more speedy tagging

I'm afraid I have seen you make too many mistakes in CSD tagging, as have other administrators, so this is a warning that the next time I see a speedy tag declined by an administrator (either me or somebody else), I will be forced to block you from editing to avoid disruption. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

WP:PROD

I have removed your PROD from Jamal Abdillah. Your rationale was that the article was largely unsourced. It is an article of 6 sentences with 5 sources. That appears to be a valid number of sources for the length of the article. ~ GB fan 10:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Another one, Noraniza Idris. She has won 12 awards. While there may not be much sourcing in the article this is definitely not a non-controversial deletion. The only time a PROD should be used is if the deletion is non-controversial. ~ GB fan 10:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Nicestupidplayground, how is this a largely unsourced BLP? It is an article about a band. It looks like you just copied and pasted a rationalle and started slapping it on articles. ~ GB fan 11:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Ditto for Danny Choo. I have no prejudice against nominating this article at AfD but it will have to be under some other valid deletion rationale. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:10, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Okay, you need to stop whatever else you're doing and give an explanation here right now, or there'll have to be a block to force you to do it. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Ritchie333, That is what it took yesterday for them to talk about their moves of Draft pages. ~ GB fan 14:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Siti Nurhaliza videography

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I notice that you changed the page Siti Nurhaliza filmography to Siti Nurhaliza videography recently. Please note that her filmography is for her television, theatre and film credits and her videography was for her music video and advertising credits. I hope you pay attention. – Fandi89 (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Sudirman Arshad

Hello Alexander Iskandar. We really hope that you remove the PROD template to Sudirman Arshad. The sources has been given just now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.140.89.61 (talk) 02:51, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malaysian Figure Skating Championships (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malaysian Figure Skating Championships and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 10:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

This submission really makes me question if you have the competence to perform maintenance tasks. When you submitted it for review did you really believe it was ready to be moved to the mainspace? ~ GB fan 10:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Day of Action for Women's Health has been accepted

International Day of Action for Women's Health, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 11:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Competence

I realise that you are blocked. I would like you to appreciate that over quite a short space of time you have made a significant mess of Speedy deletion nominations, prod nominations, article moves and redirects. If you achieve an unblock, which at present is doubtful, it would be better if you were to limit your activity to straightforward editing of articles. You have not shown a meaningful ability to understand the various procedures you have tried to partake in. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your advices. I should limit my activity to edit articles, adding citation needed. Refocus to my expertise. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CDC Malaysia (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CDC Malaysia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 23:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles are for readers

...so when you again find yourself editing, please remember that a non-existing template that is redlinked in an article, such as the one you keep adding to Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seksyen 3 Bandar Kinrara, lowers the quality of the article and does nothing to help readers of the article. Please visit WP:Template namespace#Searching for templates and WP:Requested templates for more information. And I sincerely hope you are able to work through your challenges and begin editing again soon.  Paine Ellsworth  ^put'r there  15:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Requesting deletions in Draft space

In case you become unblocked, please note that per this discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability/Archive_58#RfC:_Does_WP:N_apply_to_drafts_in_userspace_or_draftspace.3F, notability guidelines do not apply in Draft space. You made a large number of proposals for deletion in MfD which were not in-scope.Newimpartial (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop moving pages - you have just created a massive mess. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You were told multiple times by multiple admins that it is not allowed to move articles out of the main namespace without consensus. Yet you just did so with Zizan Razak. I see no request by the original creator for this to be done and no discussion that resulted in draftifying. As such, I have reverted the move. This is your last warning: Stop behaving against policies and guidelines or you will be blocked from editing. Regards SoWhy 21:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Primefac (talk) 21:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry. Is it wrong to move from article namespace to draft namespace?? Those articles are not ready yet to be Wikipedia stand-alone article. Those articles don't have citation needed to justify the subject's notability. Tell me which correct procedure is needed to move article namespace to draft namespace. As far as I know, I see a lot of drafts have been moved from article namespace. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes it is and you knew that because I told you so a few days ago. Anyway, Primefac has already blocked you by the time I wrote the warning, so it is moot now. I'm sorry to see that you were not willing to listen to multiple experienced editors telling you to stop; unfortunately, a project that lives from collaboration cannot tolerate such behavior. Regards SoWhy 21:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Some of those drafts were years old, like Mawi. Really the only acceptable time to move an article to draft is when it's brand-new. NOT when it's years old. Those either get speedied or AFDd Primefac (talk) 21:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Alexander Iskandar The solution is to heed Ritchie333's advice and stop putzing around with deletion. You just caused a massive mess that others now have to clean up as it's clear you have no idea what you were doing. (Also cc: SoWhy, I restored their block notice but accidentally removed your warning, sorry!) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit conflict. When I save my replies, your messages lost. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Actually, I thought moving from article namespace to draft namespace is similar to moving article namespace to article namespace. I've been told it is disruptive to rename draft.. Unfortunately, my actions to move articles to draft namespace are not appropriate. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. I'm not clear about this policy. Anyone can explain? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexander Iskandar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand why I am blocked for. To prevent me from making disruptive edits. Thanks for telling me the correct procedure. I should nominate those articles to AfD not moving to drafts. I hope admin can unblock me and give me chance to contribute to Wikipedia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC) I realise that draftifying is applied to new articles (created in this year 2017) and requires discussion and communication with creators and other active editors. I'm sorry for being too bold in this case. According to Wikipedia:Be bold, Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold when updating the encyclopedia. Sometimes, Wikipedia volunteers is expected to be bold but when conflicts and arguments arises, proper discussion is expected. As an experienced Wikipedia contributor and volunteer, I have common objectives just like other admins and other active contributors and volunteers, to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. If conflict arises because of controversial issues, then it should be discussed and cooperation is expected to achieve general agreement or consensus. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules policy sometimes made things becomes complicated. I respect other admin's commitment to spend their time to revert my inappropriate edits, give explanation in edit summary, give useful advices, suggestions, reminders and warnings in my talk page. I also want to give credits, to acknowledge, and to recognize other active editors who give good cooperation with me since I start editing (especially about Malaysia-related articles, politics-related articles, election-related articles) in this English Wikipedia. I know this block is not punishment but the way to prevent harm and problem to Wikipedia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have looked carefully through your edits and the disruption caused clearly crosses the line dividing bad editing from vandalism. Take your redirecting of high school articles, for example. I note that you were redirecting up to three pages a minute, plainly using some type of automated tool. There could have been no effort, because there was no time so to do, to check the articles or to search for sources. These edits are taking countless person hours to revert and the likelihood is that damage will still remain after most of your redirects have been reverted. I see no offer from you to help revert and repair the damage you have caused. I can see no benefit to the Project, and plenty of potential downside, in your being unblocked. Just Chilling (talk) 23:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your moves of articles to draft may have been the last thing, but you have been showing competence problems for a while. You were moving Drafts around. You been told to stay away from speedy deletions because you do not understand the criteria. Many of your Prods have been declined because they are not non-controversial. Now you want to nominate articles using WP:AFD? Have you even looked at the deletion policy? I do not believe unblocking you would be a benefit to the encyclopedia. I think we will be back here in a very short time. ~ GB fan 23:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

While I was writing that comment another AFC submission you made was declined. You did no work to fix the issues that had been identified by previous reviewers but resbmitted it any way. Did you really believe it was ready to be an article? ~ GB fan 23:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

I should withdraw my AFC submission. Those drafts are not ready to be Wikipedia stand-alone article. Don't have enough reliable sources for verification and non-notable yet. Draft:KEN Holdings Berhad, Draft:CDC Malaysia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

When I scroll up this talk page today, I see your replies to my questions about moving article to draft namespace. Thanks for replying. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for admins for providing explaination in edit summary and this talk page. I should understand which action is eligible/allowable/permitted and which action is not eligible/not allowable/not permitted. Below is my response to your advices:

• I agree that Wikipedia is encyclopedia project. Discussion and communication with other editors is important to achieve consensus.
• Why I made decision to move article to the draft namespace? I believe draft namespace is suitable for collaborative improvement. When they are ready with reliable sources and showing notability, then those drafts are eligible for AfC submission.
  • I quoted from Template:New page, "This page was just created. Its author is familiar with Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines and has done so in good faith. More editing may be needed to meet standards. Please do not rush to mark it for deletion, but check back in a while and/or contact the creator to ascertain his/her plans. If the creator has abandoned work on this page and is not responding to communication, you may consider deleting it or moving it to the draft namespace for collaborative improvement."
  • However, I misunderstood this good faith also applied to articles created before 2015 which are left abandoned by creators, lacking citation needed for verification, showing no improvement by creators and other editors.
• Many Malaysia-related articles have been tagged BLP sources many years ago, some have been tagged since 2007, 10 years ago. I quoted from Template:BLP sources, "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful."
• Wikipedia accept neutral point of view. How we define neutral point of view? Neutral point of view don't praise or exaggerate something, someone without acceptable proof. Advertising and promotional materials usually manipulating readers from truth. I quoted from Template:Fanpov, "This article may be written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view." Alexander Iskandar (talk) 08:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

You are very good at finding quotes from pages in the Wikipedia namespace. What you appear to have a problem with is being able to take those quotes and understand how to apply them to editing pages in Wikipedia. We had a discussion above where I had to block you to get you to talk. You pulled out quotes but did not understand when and how they apply. ABove you ask for clarification on the "policy" Redirects are Cheap. You don't seem to understand that is an essay not a policy. I don't think you understand the difference between the two of them either. ~ GB fan 16:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

I agree that Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap is essay. This essay is always used as a reason to keep redirects (with typo and honorific title) in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Please see this link --> Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 April 18#"Tan Sri" redirects and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 April 18#"Datuk" redirects. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

I understand what is my mistake. Point #3 in the Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. "On the other hand, cross-namespace redirects make processing Wikipedia content more complex for bots and scripts." Now I know why cross-namespace redirects is disruptive editing and considered as serious and vandalism by admins. It involves technical issue. Cross-namespace redirect is different than keeping or deleting redirect. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 16:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

I realise that draftifying is applied to new articles (created in this year 2017) and requires discussion and communication with creators and other active editors. I'm sorry for being too bold in this case. According to Wikipedia:Be bold, Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold when updating the encyclopedia. Sometimes, Wikipedia volunteers is expected to be bold but when conflicts and arguments arises, proper discussion is expected.

As an experienced Wikipedia contributor and volunteer, I have common objectives just like other admins and other active contributors and volunteers, to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. If conflict arises because of controversial issues, then it should be discussed and cooperation is expected to achieve general agreement or consensus. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules policy sometimes made things becomes complicated. I respect other admin's commitment to spend their time to revert my inappropriate edits, give explanation in edit summary, give useful advices, suggestions, reminders and warnings in my talk page. I also want to give credits, to acknowledge, and to recognize other active editors who give good cooperation with me since I start editing (especially about Malaysia-related articles, politics-related articles, election-related articles) in this English Wikipedia. I know this block is not punishment but the way to prevent harm and problem to Wikipedia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2006 in Malaysia and Singapore

@Kurykh: I accept that the discussion outcome was "delete. There hasn't been an articulated reason to merge these articles, while there has been one for deletion." Mass deletion involving MM YYYY in Country/Topic already happened. In case any editors want to merge content from deleted monthly articles into annual articles, they may ask admins and using correct procedure to appeal. I don't move those articles to draft namespace, but I did correct procedure by asking other editor's opinion using AfD discussion platform instead.

I made my mistake last week by making controversial draftifying many Malaysian entertainers-related articles without using AfD discussion platform, WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers talk page, WikiProject Musicians talk page, WikiProject Entertainment talk page. I also made my mistake last week by nominating speedy deletion using invalid criterion, nominating proposed deletion to controversial articles involving Malaysian entertainers-related articles. I also made my mistake last month by making controversial mass redirects involving Malaysian secondary schools without using discussion plattform like AfD, RfD or WikiProject Schools talk page. I realize that discussion is important in Wikipedia if involving mass redirect, mass delete, mass anything else to reach general agreement or consensus by Wikipedia community. I realize that @Just Chilling: already declined my unblock request, so I do not plan to request unblock at this moment, may be next month is appropriate. @Anthony Bradbury:@Primefac: I aware that you don't promise me to unblock me by asking that question. When time is appropriate, I will asking unblock request and contributing back to Wikipedia and follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Status: inactive for a while and take a vacation from Wikipedia activity. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Malaysian school-related articles controversial mass redirects

@Just Chilling: I know that I have made a lot of controversial redirects to Malaysian school-related articles without proper discussion. You and other editors may revert my edits to Malaysian school-related articles. Secondary schools generally assumed to be notable to have Wikipedia stand-alone articles, although at this moment, many Malaysian school-related articles lacking reliable sources and independent secondary sources, and many depends on primary sources (respective school website, looks like advertisement and promotional material if secondary sources are not provided to support available school website sources for verification purposes). Actually I want to revert my edits because those schools being redirected to list of schools in X without proper discussion. Since I'm still unblocked yet, any editor may check those page links (Special:WhatLinksHere) below to revert my controversial redirects to list of schools in X after that you may left those school articles with unreferenced tag, refimprove tag, notability tag, NPOV tag, cleanup tag, violation of WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT, violation of WP:NOTDIRECTORY, violation of WP:LINKFARM, violation of WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK, WP:CRYSTALBALL as Wikipedia stand-alone articles which can be easily accessed by readers using Google search engine. I understand that the creators can easily create a lot of those school-related articles and easily left abandoned those articles many years and those school-related articles still unimproved till now. X refers to Malaysian states and federal territories. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

• List of schools in Johor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Kedah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Kelantan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Kuala Lumpur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Labuan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Malacca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Negeri Sembilan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Pahang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Penang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Perak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Perlis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Putrajaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Sabah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Sarawak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Selangor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• List of schools in Terengganu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

@Just Chilling: I appreciate your great deal of efforts and spending your precious time to mass revert my edits to Malaysian school-related articles. What's to do next after mass revert those articles. I hope you and other editors will collaborate to improve those articles by adding reliable sources, independent third-party sources and do not depends solely on primary sources which is respective school website. WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. You and other editors may check page history and communicate with those school-related article creators about how to improve those articles. Our common objective are to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. I hope those articles may have reliable sources and useful to readers when they search about the school in the Google search engine. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 06:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@Just Chilling: You can check page history of articles in the Category:Boys' schools in Malaysia and Category:Girls' schools in Malaysia, I put an effort to add this link Kecemerlangan sekolah satu gender as published in the independent reliable source, Utusan Online (not official website) to verify if those schools are notable single-sex schools. By the way, I see your continuous efforts to revert my undiscussed and controversial mass redirects. I don't recommend those articles lacking reliable sources to be deleted using AfD because I appreciate a great deal of efforts by past creators, editors and volunteers contributing to those articles. However, we cannot let those articles lacking reliable sources and may contained disputed information to be remained as Wikipedia stand-alone article because those articles may be viewed by any readers any time if they searched those schools using search engine including Google. Is it useful for readers to read articles with unverified information and no reliable source to verify those informations? I learnt that at this moment Wikipedia cannot accept draftifying articles and mass-redirect articles to draft namespace is disruptive. I aware that although those articles may be deleted by admins, future editors may appeal to restore those deleted articles and start improving those articles. I understand that either keep or delete, either redirect or delete, either inclusionist or deletionist, but not either delete or draft. I know that my controversial mass redirect issue started since last month, April 2017, although I start editing in Wikipedia two years ago. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 13:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

After checking Special:WhatLinksHere, I found a few articles still being redirected to List of schools in X and I request that it should be reverted to previous edits if possible.

• Sekolah Menengah Seg Hwa (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMJK Seg Hwa instead)
• Chio Min Secondary School
• Keat Hwa II Secondary School
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Bakar Arang (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Bakar Arang instead)
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tunku Sulong (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Tunku Sulong instead)
• Sin Min Secondary School
• SMJK Chio Min (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chio Min Secondary School instead)
• Smjk sin min (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sin Min Secondary School instead)
• SMK Ayer Hangat
• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Taman Jelutong (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Taman Jelutong instead)
• SMK Desa Petaling
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Desa Petaling
• SMJK Chong Hwa
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Vivekananda
• Kuen Cheng Girls School
• Convent Bukit nanas
• Chong hwa gombak
• Chong Hwa Independent High School
• Chung Hwa Independent High School
• SMK Pantai
• Kolej Tuanku Ja'afar
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seremban 2 (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Seremban 2 instead)
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, Negeri Sembilan (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Tuanku Abdul Rahman instead)
• SMK Tuanku Abdul Rahman
• User:Waleedpak/Sultan Abu Bakar School (SABS), Kuantan (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sultan Abu Bakar School (SABS), Kuantan instead)
• Poi Lam Secondary School (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam instead)
• San Min National Type Secondary School
• Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam
• Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam (SUWA) (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam instead)
• Smjk san min (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to San Min National Type Secondary School instead)
• SMK Seri Perak
• DoubleCLiCC (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
• Chung Ling High School Penang (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
• Chung Ling High School, Penang (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
• Chung ling college (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
• SMJK JIT SIN (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Jit Sin High School instead)
• SMK Putrajaya Presint 9(2)
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Putrajaya Presint 8 (1)
• KK High School
• Majakir Secondary School
• SMK Majakir Papar
• Sekolah Menegah Kebangsaan Pengiran Omar
• Sekolah Menegah Pengiran Omar
• Sekolah Menegah Sipitang
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Majakir Papar
• Sekolah Pengiraan Menengah Pengiran Omar
• SM La Salle, Kota Kinabalu
• SM St Joseph Papar
• SM St Mary Papar
• SMK Agama Kota Kinabalu
• SMK Agama Tun Ahmadshah
• SMK Bahang (Penampang)
• SMK Bahang Penampang
• SMK Datuk Peter Mojuntin
• SMK Majakir
• SMK Majakir Papar
• SMK St Joseph Papar
• SMK St Mary Papar
• SMK St Peter Bundu
• SMK St Peter Bundu Kuala Penyu, Sabah, Malaysia
• SMK Takis
• SMK Takis Papar
• SMKA Kota Kinabalu
• St Joseph Secondary School
• St. Michael's Secondary School (Penampang)
• STTSS
• Sung Siew
• Sungsiew
• Takis Secondary School
• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SMK Matunggong, Kudat (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Matunggong, Kudat)
• Eton of Borneo
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Jalan Arang
• SMK St. Anthony
• SMK St. Theresa
• SMK Sungai Tapang
• SMK Tun Abdul Razak
• Catholic High School Football Club
• Cempaka School
• Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Yuk Chai
• Sekolah Menengah Damansara Utama
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Bandar Baru Sultan Suleiman
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Damansara Utama
• Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Puchong Utama (1)
• SMK Bandar Utama 3
• Smk bandar utama 3
• SMK Taman Desa, Bandar Country Homes,Rawang
• User:Adrianachew/Cempaka Cheras School
• User:Cempaka Cheras School
• Draft:Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seksyen 3 Bandar Kinrara
• Draft:Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama Al-Irshad
• Draft:SMK LEMBAH SUBANG PJ
• Draft:SMK Bandar Utama Damansara 3

Below are list of primary schools in Malaysia:

• Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina Jalan Davidson (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Han Ming (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Yuk Chai (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (Cina) Chin Hwa (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (T) St. Teresa Convent (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah kebangsaan dato' hashim (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Bukit Pantai (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Bukit Tiu (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Danau Kota (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Dato' Hashim (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Felda Selasih (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Guar Nangka (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Perempuan Methodist MGS (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Seri Setia (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Sungai Binjai (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• Sekolah Kebangsaan Taman Suria (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJKC Damansara (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJKC Han Chiang (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJKC Jalan Davidson (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJKC Khiak Yew (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJKC Yuk Chai (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Chung Hua 4 1/2 (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Damansara (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Han Chiang (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Han Ming (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Kwang Hwa (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Pin Hwa 2 (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Taman Connaught (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(C) Yuk Chai (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(T) Bandar Mentakab (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK(T) St. Teresa Convent (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK (C) Chung Hua 4 1/2 (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK (C) Han Ming (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK (C) Lai Meng (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK (C) Liman (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK (C) Sin Kwang (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK (C) Tenang (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SJK (Tamil) Bandar Mentakab (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SK Bukit Tiu (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SK Dato' Hashim (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SK Kuala Papar (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SK Simpang Lima (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SK Taman Hi-Tech (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• SRJK Liman Kati (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• St Xavier Branch School (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• St Xavier Cawangan (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• St. Xavier Branch School (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• St. Xavier Cawangan (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• St. Xavier Pulau Tikus (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
• St. Xavier's Branch School (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)

I actually planned to insert Template:Under construction above all list of schools in Malaysian states. Since I already blocked because of draftifying, nominating speedy deletion without valid criterion, nominating proposed deletion to disputed Malaysian entertainer-related articles and also do not revert all my controversial mass-redirect. I have difficult time to work my plan.

Wikipedia:Perennial proposals.

I would like to suggest and recommend this information pages, WP:PERENNIAL to be read by anyone who have doubt and unfamiliar with Wikipedia (including me). This page records the list of rejected proposals with reasons on why those proposals were declined by the community. This page also highlighted the phrase consensus can change when situation is favorable. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello @Biblioworm:, your proposal Wikipedia:WikiProject Reforming Wikipedia/Draftifying have long-term benefits for Wikipedia. It is not good and fair to WP:BITE the newcomers/regular editors by deleting their non-notable articles (including articles without or lacking reliable sources/independent secondary sources) as they really spend a lot of valuable time and a great deal of efforts. I quoted from this proposal, "Basically, all general CSD criteria would still be valid reasons for immediate deletion. We would draftify articles that meet current CSD criteria A1, A3, A7, and A9. These "criteria for speedy deletion" would become "criteria for speedy draftification." However, any article that meets criteria A2, A5, A10, and A11 would be speedily deleted as usual. To encapsulate, all general CSD criteria, as well as the A2, A5, A10, and A11 criteria, would remain valid reasons for speedy deletion. A1, A3, A7, and A9 would no longer be valid reasons for speedy deletion, but they would become valid reasons to immediately draftify an article." I also quoted from this proposal, "...(Consider the fact that the Twitter article was initially tagged for speedy deletion per A7. It is now a good article.)..." I know this proposal is not a Wikipedia policy yet and should be discussed and negotiated in WP:GOODFAITH to achieve consensus by Wikipedia community. Consensus is important in Wikipedia.

I quote from WP:BITE, "Wikipedia articles are improved through the hard work of both regular editors and newcomers. Remember: all of us were new editors at Wikipedia once, and in some ways (such as when editing an article on a topic outside our usual scope) even the most experienced among us are still newcomers.

New members are prospective contributors and are therefore Wikipedia's most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience—nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility. It is very unlikely for a newcomer to be completely familiar with Wikipedia's markup language and its myriad policies, guidelines, and community standards when they start editing. Even the most experienced editors may need a gentle reminder from time to time."

I should avoid making a mess/clutter/chaos of speedy deletion nominations, proposed deletion nominations, article moves and redirects. I should read carefully Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, Wikipedia:Arguments to make in deletion discussions, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes, Wikipedia:Notability. Admins, please consider my unblock request as soon as possible. Best regards. @Primefac:@GB fan:@Just Chilling:@SoWhy:@Anthony Bradbury:@Ritchie333: Alexander Iskandar (talk) 17:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

@Burning Pillar: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § Delete unreferenced articles. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not take this question as being any sort of unblock promise. If you were to be unblocked would you agree to limit your editing only to article space, either improving or creating articles, and talk page comments or suggestions?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

@Anthony Bradbury: I agree to limit my editing to article space, either improving or creating articles, and talk page comments or suggestions. I know that I have made a significant mess of Speedy deletion nominations, proposed deletion nominations, article moves and cross-namespace redirects (from article namespace to draft namespace). Let me quote from Wikipedia:Competence is required, "Where we often see big controversies, though, is with editors who are unintentionally and often unknowingly disruptive while trying to help. This is where we sometimes see an unintended side effect of our (generally quite useful) notion of assuming good faith. Many editors have focused so much on this tenet that they have come to believe that good faith is all that is required to be a useful contributor. Sadly, this is not the case at all. Competence is required as well. A mess created in a sincere effort to help is still a mess.

Clearly, every editor is incompetent when doing some types of edits in certain subject areas, so it is important to know or discover your limitations." Alexander Iskandar (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Anthony Bradbury would it not be better to just limit them from the area that they were being disruptive in? So only excluding them from drafts, proposing deletions of any form, and redirects without going through redirects for discussion. Perhaps there could even be a thing where they have to get admin approval to nominate something for deletion. I looked over their contributions and aside from this automated disruption--which indeed wasted lots of volunteer hours fixing, it appears they are a good contributor to articles with movies, music, etc, with categorizing with Hotcat as well as others. So if you need specifics in terms of duration, I think a year would be fine. Also Alexander Iskandar, no, every editor is not incompetent when doing some types of edits in certain subject areas. If you feel as though you're not sure about something, look at the reliable sources, follow procedures, ask questions. There is no deadline. No need to be "quick" about edits unless reverting blatant vandalism. Tutelary (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Mass cross-namespace redirects and PROD nominations by Alexander Iskandar: Page history analysis

@Primefac: insert "over a redirect without leaving a redirect: vandalous edit" inside edit summary when they revert my mass cross-namespace redirects

@Chrissymad: insert "Last good (TW)" and "rmv vandalism" inside edit summary when they revert to previous edit before me

@SoWhy: insert "over a redirect without leaving a redirect: unexplained move of article to draft space without consensus" inside edit summary when they revert my mass cross-namespace redirects

• Adira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links, blog links; InternetArchiveBot rescued those sources by adding archived copy; tagged db-person template by me using CSDA7 criterion; @SoWhy: Decline speedy - Article claims importance/significance of the subject (CSDH); created on 6 February 2011‎ by Gianna Bailey
• Afdlin Shauki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found blog link and imdb link; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; created on 25 January 2007‎ by Niduzzi
• AG Coco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links, found available sources; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; created on 11 February 2014 by‎ Manusiafaiz
• Ahmad Zamil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • at first, I tagged db-person template, @Ritchie333: decline A7, but insert PROD template instead, his reason "largely unsourced BLP"; I made an edit by changing from PROD template to PROD BLP template; When tagged PROD BLP template, this article only had self-published blog WP:SELFPUBLISH; @GB fan: said in their edit summary, "BLPPROD does not apply as there is a source, it does not need to be reliable to make ineligible for BLPPROD"; created on 16 October 2005‎ by 203.106.99.41 (thanks @Fandi89: for showing efforts by adding reliable sources after this article being tagged BLPPROD template)
• Ash Nair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • one available source, one dead link; tagged db-person template by me using CSDA7 criterion; @SoWhy: Decline speedy - Article claims importance/significance of the subject (CSDH); tagged PROD template by me; created on 10 December 2006‎ by Samadhi88
• Awal Ashaari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found one dead link, two available sources; tagged PROD template by me; 118.101.200.181 deprod without any given reason; created on 31 October 2008‎ by Illuminated999
• Bernie Chan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found imdb link and her resume? tagged PROD template source by me, deleted by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: Expired PROD, NN failed rescue; created on 6 August 2008 by‎ Winston Kit
• Daniel Lee Chee Hun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links; tagged PROD template by me; created on 25 September 2005 by Andylkl
• Daniella Sya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, tagged PROD template by me; created on 22 November 2010‎ by Phasiren
• Estranged (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found blog links, self-published sources; tagged BLP sources; unreferenced section in the recognition section; created on 20 October 2008‎ by Penulis
• Exists (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • unreferenced? incomplete?; tagged PROD template by me; created on 2 August 2009‎ by JaymanJohn
• Faradina Mohd. Nadzir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • no reliable source to verify her birth date and discography; tagged PROD template by me; created on 20 June 2005‎ by Garytmlee
• Farah Asyikin Zulkifli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • no reliable sources on this articles; found dead link; tagged PROD template by me; created on 2 September 2006 by Horacenew
• Flava (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • unreferenced? tagged BLP sources by me; created on 10 February 2013 by NotWith
• Gerhana Skacinta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • no reliable source, only Myspace link? found authority control WP:MIRROR; tagged BLP sources by me; created on 30 December 2006 by Interlingua
• Innuendo (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • unreferenced?; found authority control WP:MIRROR; tagged BLP sources by me; created on 19 May 2005‎ by 210.19.137.13
• Jamal Abdillah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found one dead link; other sources are available; Actually, I added this ref "Keturunan Banjar Di Malaysia Jadi Melayu Baru - ANTARA News Kalimantan Selatan - ANTARA News Kalimantan Selatan - Berita Terkini Kalimantan Selatan". Retrieved 2015-10-09. two years ago; tagged PROD template by me; @GB fan: deprod; they inserted "Largely unsourced? a six sentence article with 5 sources does not seem to be largely unsourced" in their edit summary; created on 27 April 2006‎ by Aiman abmajid
• JJ Fernandez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • WP:SELFPUBLISH, tagged PROD template by me, deleted by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: Expired PROD,non notable, barely asserts significance, unable to locate sorcing
• Joshua Fernandez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found available sources; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; created on 7 April 2007‎ by Sutradara
• Kaer Azami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead link; unverified Twitter account; tagged db-person by me using CSDA7 criterion; @SoWhy: Decline speedy - claims coverage in reliable source. Also, after ten years, it should really be taken to WP:AFD instead (CSDH); tagged PROD template by me; created on 7 July 2007‎ by McLibra
• Karen Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • no available reliable sources on this articles to verify her birth date, discography, all sources are dead link; 404 - File or directory not found; tagged PROD template by me; PROD template removed by 175.140.89.61; created on 27 January 2007 by Yikyang
• Kyoto Protocol (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found ReverbNation source; tagged BLP sources by me; created on 9 August 2012‎ by Nicyap97
• Marion Caunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, tagged PROD template by me, deleted by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: Expired PROD, not notable, barely asserts significance
• Marsha Milan Londoh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found some dead links and other available reliable sources; tagged db-person by me using CSDA7 criterion; @Ritchie333: decline A7, try PROD / AfD; tagged PROD template by me; created on 19 April 2008‎ by My December (old)
• Mawi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found one blog link (the only source?) WP:BLOGS; I quoted from WP:VERIFY policy, "quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations"; tagged PROD template by me; created on 14 November 2005‎ by 218.208.251.212
• Meeia Foo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links; "the page you are looking for is unavailable"; Chinese-language sources are acceptable as long as can be translated into English; tagged PROD template by me; @Kuyabribri: deprod; "there are claimed sources but they are in a foreign language. Needs attention from someone familiar with that language, not deletion."; created on 10 June 2011‎ by Wcc010487
• Meet Uncle Hussain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found self-published source; recognition section is unreferenced; created on 22 February 2009‎ by Arteyu
• Misha Omar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • unreferenced? found authority control WP:MIRROR; tagged PROD template by me initially; later changed into PROD BLP template by me; @GB fan: reverted my edits "There were sources on the article in the past so BLPPROD does not apply. there is enough in the article to claim notability so it is not non-controversial, WP:AFD if you think it should be deleted. ([[WP:TW|..."; checking previous revisions, I found self-published link WP:SELFPUBLISH WP:FAN, but not an independent source; created on 1 May 2006‎ by EEEee
• Nana (deejay) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links; tagged db-person by me using CSDA7 criterion; @SoWhy: Decline speedy - regularly writing for a notable newspaper indicates significance (CSDH); tagged PROD template by me; created on 9 June 2006‎ by Saifudinbahrudin
• Nikki (Malaysian singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links; tagged db-person template by me using CSDA7 criterion; @Ritchie333: decline A7, try PROD / AfD; tagged PROD BLP template by me; created on 26 August 2004‎ by 66.124.207.33
• Nina Nadira Naharuddin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links; tagged db-person by me using CSDA7 criterion; @SoWhy: Decline speedy - hosting a TV show on a notable network indicates significance (CSDH); tagged PROD template by me; created on 15 October 2015‎ by Syamimi Shaffi
• Noraniza Idris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found one book source and available AllMusic database sources; tagged PROD template, @GB fan: reverted my edit and deprod, "While sourcing is lacking, there is a clear claim to notability, multiple awards won."; created on 21 May 2007‎ by OmarQ~enwiki
• OAG (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links; found MuzikRock database sources; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; created on 29 July 2007‎ by Kawaputra
• Patrick Teoh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found available sources, found block links; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; created on 9 August 2007‎ by Suanie
• Pop Shuvit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, self-published sources; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; created on 21 February 2007‎ by Keviinx
• Radhi-O (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links; tagged PROD template by me; @GB fan: removed unsourced contentious info about a living person; redirected by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: redirect to OAG (band) no independent notability, if anyone searches, they can find info there, created on 1 November 2008‎ by Niduzzi
• Raja Farah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links; tagged PROD template by me, deleted by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection: Expired PROD, NN, no clear assertion of significance. dearth of coverage. there is a blogger of the same name
• Remnant (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • no reliable source, only Facebook link?; tagged BLP sources by me; created on 14 September 2005‎ by 69.3.217.56
• Riz (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links WP:FAN; tagged db-person template by me using CSDA7 criterion; @SoWhy: deprod, "Decline speedy - Article claims importance/significance of the subject (CSDH)"; tagged PROD template by me; created on 18 July 2008‎ by Sarahallyssa
• Rueben Thevandran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found many dead links, irrelevant links, WP:NOTGALLERY; tagged PROD template by me; created on 7 June 2011‎ by Mercuryearthquake
• Salamiah Hassan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead link; tagged PROD template by me, deleted by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: Expired PROD,non notable
• Sarimah Ibrahim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found available sources; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; accolade section is unreferenced; created on 22 December 2006‎ by Fantastic4boy~enwiki
• Sea*A (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found self-published sources; tagged BLP sources by me; milestone section is unreferenced; created on 14 May 2013 by PaanApollo
• Shahir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found a lot of self published sources, WP:SELFPUBLISH WP:FAN; see WP:VERIFY policy; found one dead link in reference section; tagged PROD template by me; tagged unreferenced section in the awards and nominations section; created on 23 May 2010‎ by Zamyusoff
• Shock System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found self-published source; tagged BLP sources by me; created on 29 March 2007‎ by Xumb
• Soo Kui Jien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead link; tagged PROD template by me; deprod by 175.140.89.61; created on 16 September 2006‎ by Horacenew
• Sudirman Arshad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found book sources, available independent secondary sources; tagged PROD template by me; @Fandi89: later adding references; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; @Usernamekiran: Reverted edits by 175.140.89.61 (talk) to last version by Fandi89; @Tuxipedia: deprod, "18 sources --> not "largely unsourced""; awards and recognition contain no reference; created on 19 January 2006‎ by Aiman abmajid
• Suki Low (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found self-published source, Suki's facebook account, found dead links; tagged PROD template by me; 118.101.200.181 deprod without any reason; created on 26 August 2006‎ by Horacenew
• Tengku Mohd Ean Nasrun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead link; tagged PROD template by me, deleted by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: Largely unsourced BLP
• Truck (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead link; tagged BLP sources by me; created on 2 October 2006‎ by JYAR255418
• Vince Chong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links WP:FAN; tagged PROD template by me; created on 17 December 2006‎ by Aziyamarcee
• Wayne Chua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead link; tagged PROD template by me, deleted by admin @Dlohcierekim: reason given: Expired PROD, sources, content do not show notability
• Yasmin Yusoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found dead links, found available sources; tagged PROD template by me; 175.140.89.61 deprod without any given reason; created on 24 August 2009‎ by Firebird909
• Zamani Ibrahim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found blog link WP:TRIVIA, one dead link, one available source published by Astro Awani; any editor should insert Category:1971 births; tagged PROD template by me; created on 1 September 2016‎ by Smse89
• Zizan Razak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • found one available source, one dead link; created on 4 May 2017‎ by Ismael866 (all articles created by Ismael866 are eligible to be redirected to draft namespace by admin without leaving redirect; should go under scrutiny of AfC submission reviewers)

Comments

• I found similarities on most of the articles listed above, such as having dead links, needing rescues by InternetArchiveBot, lacking reliable sources, most depend on primary articles (personal websites and self-published sources), creating by single-purpose account WP:SPA, those articles have long history of neutral point of view issues and written from fan's point of view. Looks trivial content dominating article rather than encyclopedic content. Editors should be aware that they volunteer themselves to contribute for a better encyclopedia.
• I understand that a big number of those articles already exist since 2000s. WP:SILENCE after many years signify its importance to exist as independent Wikipedia stand-alone article. Those articles have long history of contributors, so it is controversial to nominate those articles using CSD and PROD nominations. It is a diplomatic way to use AfD platform to reach consensus either keep, merge or delete.
• Based on my user contribution, I started to made a mass cross-namespace redirects since 20:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC). The first article involved was Remnant (band).
• Before that, I made useful contributions by categorising those musical groups into specific musical group by genre categories based on infobox. I also done categorising those singers into specific singer by genre categories based on infobox. I categorising actors and actressess into specific production house's contract player categories earlier.
• Before I got involved into mass cross-namespace redirects like this, I made mistakes by renaming drafts when I see something wrong with draft page title. I already being warned by @GB fan: that moving around draft namespace without discussion is disruptive and may cause unnecessary redirect, later I was blocked for three hours. Then, I stop renaming drafts and let it be with all capital letters, typo error and all that silly problem. I learnt that renaming drafts do not matters when drafts are in progress. What matters are those drafts being submitted for AfC to be reviewed by listed AfC reviewers. Only then, when those AfC submission being accepted, renaming drafts is necessary to follow article naming standard policy.
• I also made MfD nominations involving many drafts. I see some drafts should be redirected to existing article namespace. Is it true that both Category:AfC submissions declined as already existing‎ and Category:AfC submissions declined as a duplicate‎ should always be empty because they should be redirected automatically to existing article namespace since the reviewer already decide to decline AFC submission using these specific reasons.
• Last month, I made mass-redirect involving Malaysian school-related articles without proper discussion. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 23:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user

Hello @Primefac:@Chrissymad:@SoWhy:@GB fan:@Just Chilling:@Anthony Bradbury:@Kuyabribri:@Tuxipedia:@Ritchie333: (Thanks for your previous messages in my talk page, I hope you still watch my talk page and have time to discuss with me here). May I ask question about cross-namespace redirect? Based on WP:R2, let me quote, "This applies to Redirects, apart from shortcuts, from the main namespace to any other namespace except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces.

If the redirect was the result of a page move, consider waiting a day or two before deleting the redirect. See also Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects and Category:Cross-namespace redirects."

{{Db-r2}}, {{Db-rediruser}}

Is it true that {{Db-r2}} can be placed inside article namespace after redirecting article to draft namespace only after reach consensus in AfD/RfD/MfD discussion? Let say before this I did not make an undiscussed cross-namespace redirect Farah Asyikin Zulkifli to Draft:Farah Asyikin Zulkifli but I nominate Farah Asyikin Zulkifli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to AfD/RfD/MfD instead. After that the result outcome may be keep with the reason, Farah Asyikin Zulkifli is notable enough to have Wikipedia stand-alone article although the articles has no reliable source yet. Some users/inclusionists may argue claiming WP:MUSTBESOURCES. Some deletionists may suggesting deletion and said other editors can appeal to undelete in future. Another user may comment WP:USERFY to the creator's user page but the creator @Horacenew: inactive since 2007. Another choice seldom used by AfD participants is WP:DRAFTIFY. Draftification as a solution in AfD is the main idea in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Reforming Wikipedia/Draftifying proposed by @Biblioworm: in July 2016. I do not know why no editors open discussion in the talk page. Please let me know what do you think about draftifying. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 10:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

When I check my AfD stats, I see Number of AfD's where vote matched result (green cells): 10 (62.5%). I aware that there are nine type of possible votes in AfD: Abbreviation key: K = Keep D = Delete SK = Speedy Keep SD = Speedy Delete M = Merge R = Redirect T = Transwiki U = Userfy/Draftify NC = No Consensus Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

I think you need to get your thoughts in order, because I can barely understand that paragraph. You started off asking about {{db-r2}}, never actually asked a question, then started talking about a hypothetical AFD (again, no question) and finished off by transitioning to your AFD stats (still no question). Do you actually have a question or are you simply trying to "prove" that you're competent enough to continue working productively on Wikipedia?

Also, as a note, the people who are interested in this case will already be watching the page. You don't need to send out a dozen pings every time you post. Primefac (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

I admit that I made a lot of mistakes about mass redirect without proper discussion since April 2017 (please check my user contribution). I did not simply redirect all Malaysian schools to list of schools in X but I choose only articles lacking reliable sources. @Just Chilling: cannot accept my undiscussed mass redirect and already reverted my redirect to previous revisions. I respect him and avoid edit warring because I understand WP:3RR. Actually I plan to insert {{under construction}} above all list of schools in X. X refers to Malaysian states and federal territories. I also plan to revert my undiscussed mass redirect to hundreds of Malaysian schools. I forgot to revert them and I made mass cross namespace redirect to a lot of Malaysian entertainers articles. Before that, I tagged db-person template, CSD template using A7 criterion, proposed deletion template to controversial articles. After making all mistakes, I realise that I should bring them to AfD discussion platform not doing unnecessary things like that. At this moment, AfD stands for Article for Deletion, who knows Wikipedia community prefer for Article for Draftifying. By the way, let me know how to be unblocked? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Events in rail transport by month links

Template:Events in rail transport by month links has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Finngall ^talk 23:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films produced by Ahmad Puad Onah

A tag has been placed on Category:Films produced by Ahmad Puad Onah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 07:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: KEN Holdings Berhad (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KEN Holdings Berhad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)