User talk:Alexbot

If you have any comment, please leave messages in zh:User talk:Alexsh, Thank you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexbot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It is not serious to block indefinite for block reason.and this block, I cannot run interwiki now.

Decline reason:

The block is currently being discussed at WT:BRFA, no need to post request here. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 14:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

tagged by Bot operator --Alex S.H. Lin 13:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

So noted. I'll ping the blocking admin, though I notice that you've done that already. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

It looks like the block came about as a result of discussion at Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval, where this bot's flag has been proposed for removal. Could I get you to head over to that discussion and explain what's going on? Thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

November 08

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Kilmainham Gaol, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you.--Domer48_'fenian' 18:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Oi leave it alone

Dear Your Botness,

Please stop altering my link. I've added it twice now. The first time it made me muck up a lot of link edits, my fault as I should have put Template:underconstruction. But since I linked it all manually I don't really want a bot to change it, there was a reason for it. Is there a specific tag to stop linking this ONE tag? Thanks SimonTrew (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Changes made by this bot cannot be "peer" reviewed.

I saw some changes made to Aircraft principal axes by this bot in a language other than English. Since we English speakers can't be presumed to know these languages, we can't know what is being said. It just looks like possible vandalism. I have a real problem with changes to "my" pages that I can't read to review. If the bot included an English translation, that would be better, but it would still require either 1) trusting the bot's translation or 2) trusting that it isn't a real person pretending to be a presumably trustworthy bot so as to vandalize "under the radar".

--Gummer85 (talk) 17:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, okay, please leave me alone

Your bot put a "please translate" notice on my article, but that's exactly what I am doing. Maybe you could tell the bot to leave an article alone for a couple of hours before you apply the tag, so as to prevent an unpleasant "edit conflict"? Chutznik (talk) 01:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Sangsom 6-red World Grand Prix 2009

This bot is adding the ru:Sangsom 6-red World Grand Prix link to the Sangsom 6-red World Grand Prix 2009 article, which are two seperate article with different contents. Armbrust (talk) 09:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Korg PS-3300

There is no corresponding article in DE:WP. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 08:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Gwyn Nicholls

The English Gwyn Nicholls article should not be linked to the Swedish Gwyn.

Rosie Malek-Yonan's name in Farsi needs no hyphen

Recently a hyphen was added in Rosie Malek-Yonan's last name when spelled in Farsi. Though her last name does have a hyphen in English, when translated into Farsi, there should be no hyphen. I've removed it a few times but it appears again. Can you please help remove it. Thanks! Zayya 17:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Automobile

Think your robot went a little nuts on Automobile. I reverted but please check to see what it thought it was doing so it doesn't do it again. Dino246 (talk) 08:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Bulldog Drummond 1929

Hi,

I have been doing a lot of research on the Bulldog Drummond character.

I want to say that the picture that you removed was on another article that had nothing to do with the actual movie. It was placed in another article - wrong year and actress.

All I did was remove it and tried to place it properly in the correct movie article.

I had noticed that the picture (which is great for information) had been taken off.

I will say, I spent over an hour trying to match it right on the page article - no easy feat when time is constrained - which is always the key with me. Time/effort.

Can you try to help me place it correctly. I was the one who noticed it was all-wrong in the first place.

Hired Ghoul (talk) 22:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)