User talk:Alexzr88

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Slike[edit]

Vidi ovako: na Vikipediju ne možeš stavljati slike koje nemaju definisan copyright status. Sve slike bez definisanog status se brišu. Slike koje si ti ubacio će možda stojati ovde dva ili tri meseca ali posle će ih ljudi koji to proveravaju pronaći i obrisati zbog nedefinisanog copyright statusa. Dakle, ako si ti slikao te slike onda ih ti kao autor možeš označiti slobodnim za upotrebu ("Public domain" ili "GNU free documentation"), a ako nisi ti njihov autor, moraš da dokažeš da je njihov autor dozvolio da se slike koriste na Vikipediji. U suprotnom će slike biti obrisane i nema svrhe da ih stavljaš u bilo koji članak, jer tamo neće biti duže od dva, tri meseca (ako i toliko) jer će ih tada administratori obrisati. Sa druge strane, one slike koje ti uklanjaš iz članka o Zrenjaninu su slobodne za upotrebu, i neće biti obrisane jer ih je na Vikipediju stavio njihov autor i označio ih slobodnim za upotrebu. Pretpostavljam da je razlog što uklanjaš te slike to što su im imena na mađarskom, ali ja ne vidim da je to neki problem. U pitanju su samo slike i ne vidim problem u tome da je ime slike napisano na bilo kom jeziku (ili da je ime samo neki broj). Druga je stvar naravno na kom će jeziku biti napisano ime Zrenjanina u člancima na Vikipediji. Tu u obzir dolazi samo srpski naravno, ali ponavljam, ovde su u pitanju samo slike, odnosno obične ilustracije za članak, i potpuno je svejedno na kom će jeziku njihova imena biti napisana. Sa druge strane, meni se lično te slike sviđaju (a i ti ne možeš negirati da su lepe), prema tome ne vidim razlog da ih ukloniš. Naravno, nema problema da pored tih slika ti ubaciš još neke slike, ali molim te da slike koje ubaciš imaju definisan copyright status i izvor odakle su uzete (ili da naznačiš da si ti njihov autor, ukoliko jesi), jer si ih u suprotnom džabe ubacivao, pošto će biti obrisane. Slobodno me kontaktiraj na mojoj strani za razgovor ako ti je potrebna neka pomoć oko tih slika. PANONIAN (talk) 21:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mali most i Reformatorska crkva.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mali most i Reformatorska crkva.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Odgovor[edit]

Evo vidiš, to je upravo ono što sam ti pričao. Pronašli su tvoju sliku i obavestili te da će je obrisati jer nema copyright status. Dakle, ako si autor slika ti onda kod svake slike to i napiši (nešto kao "I am the author"), a što se tiče copyright statusa, možeš na svaku sliku staviti ovo: ((PD-self))

Na tvojoj strani za razgovor će se videti znak, ali edituj stranu da vidiš šta da napišeš (PD-self sa dve krive zagrade). PANONIAN (talk) 00:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Još nešto, kad staviš taj copyright znak, onda obriši znak koji su oni stavili da slika nema definisan copyright status. PANONIAN (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:HPIM2282.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HPIM2282.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slike (ponovo)[edit]

Evo napravio sam kategoriju gde su sve slike Zrenjanina i okolnih sela, pa pogledaj ako hoćeš:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Zrenjanin_images

Inače stavi što pre taj "PD-self" znak na sve slike koje si ti uradio da ti ih ne bi obrisali, jer vidim da su već stavili znake za brisanje na neke od njih. Što se tiče ove razglednice (koju sigurno nisi ti radio), ako je ta slika starija od 1923 onda nju možeš označiti kao "PD" ili "PD-US" ali obavezno napiši i iz koje je godine slika i onda ni nju neće obrisati. Ovde imaš spisak tih tagova (znakova) za copyright status na slikama:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags

Inače možeš napraviti i galeriju slika koje si ti uradio ako želiš. Ja sam na primer napravio galeriju slika Novog Sada koje sam slikao:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PANONIAN/Images

Ti možeš napraviti ovakvu: User:Alexzr88/Images

I poslednja stvar, pošto sam sada video da si pisao i na mojoj strani za razgovor na srpskoj Vikipediji, kada staviš copyright znakove na svoje slike, nema nikakvih problema da te slike ubaciš u članak o Zrenjaninu i da zameniš sliku crkve na glavnom trgu sa tvojom koja je slikana po lepšem vremenu. Međutim što se tiče slika mosta na Begeju ili sudnice, te slike nemoj sklanjati iz članka, jer ne postoji trenutno lepša zamena za njih. PANONIAN (talk) 13:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright znak (tag) treba da staviš na svaku sliku koju si ubacio, znači edituješ sliku, napišeš tamo "I am the author" i ubaciš copyright znak ((PD-self)) (samo u špicastim zagradama ne u ovim običnim) i snimiš stranicu. Naravno kad staviš copyright znak onda obrišeš znak za brisanje slike koji su ti oni stavili, ali nemoj brisati kategorije (koje sam ja stavio na tvoje slike). Ovako treba da izgleda jedna slika:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Prefecture.png

Pogledaj šta tu ima, pa uradi tako (slobodno edituj ovu moju sliku da vidiš šta tamo piše, ali je nemoj menjati i snimiti). PANONIAN (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Video sam da si stavio znakove na neke slike, samo ih stavi na sve slike koje si ubacio, pogotovo na one koje se nalaze u nekim člancima. Ovde imaš sve tvoje slike, pa možeš staviti tagove gde fale:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Zrenjanin_images

PANONIAN (talk) 21:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC) ---[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:HPIM3116.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HPIM3116.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Odgovor[edit]

"Postavio sam sliku suda,umesto vase.Nadam se da odgovara."

Kako god, ionako to nije moja slika već drugog korisnika. Inače, kao što rekoh glavni problem sa tvojim slikama je bio copyright status, pošto smo to rešili slobodno ubaci još slika ako želiš. Inače zaboravio si da staviš copyright tagove na ove slike:

Uradi to što pre. Nije u redu da ja stavljam copyright na slike čiji si ti autor. :) PANONIAN (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zamolio bih te još dve stvari u vezi slika koje ubacuješ. Jedno je da napišeš u kom su gradu slikane, jer ovaj spomenik J. J. Zmaja je u Novom Sadu na primer. I drugo da slike ubaciš u neku kategoriju slika, kao što su: "Category:Zrenjanin images", "Category:Novi Sad images", ili ako ne postoji posebna kategorija za neko mesto ili grad, onda je možeš ubaciti u "Category:Vojvodina images" (ako je u Vojvodini) ili "Category:Serbia images" (ako je u Centralnoj Srbiji). Ta kategorizacija je važna da bismo imali lepe galerije slika u tim kategorijama. PANONIAN (talk) 12:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa[edit]

Pa nisam ja postavio tu mapu lokacije Zrenjanina, a nemam sada vremena da tražim bolju. Ako ti nađeš neku bolju, slobodno je stavi. PANONIAN (talk) 19:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Video sam da si stavio bolju mapu, međutim nisi na nju stavio stavio copyright tag. Rekoh ti već zašto je važno da ga stavljaš, jer slike koje nemaju tag se brišu. Ako si ovu sliku napravio od neke druge koja je na Vikipediji, trebao bi da staviš isti tag kao i na toj slici i da napišeš da si svoju sliku napravio od te. PANONIAN (talk) 21:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:KARTA.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KARTA.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:52, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Mapa[edit]

Mapa Jugoslavije sa banovinama već postoji na Vikipediji:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Banovine_kj.jpg

Imaš i ovu na nemačkoj Vikipediji:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Kgr._Jugoslawien.jpg

PANONIAN (talk) 23:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Grb SR Srbije 2.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb SR Srbije 2.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Talk:Nigger, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HumbleGod 19:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ekonomija okruga[edit]

Ok vidi: ja nemam pojma o ekonomiji srednjobanatskog okruga, ali je poenta da sadržaj članka proširimo a ne da ga smanjimo. Tekst je originalno preuzet sa sajta vlade Srbije pa pretpostavljam da su te firme što se tamo pominju nekada nešto značile, a nigde ne piše da mi moramo da pomenemo samo firme koje danas dobro posluju. Dakle predlažem ti ovo: da popraviš ono što misliš da treba u članku, ali ne tako što ćeš obrisati firme koje danas ne rade, već da kod firmi što su tamo pomenute napišeš da su nekada dobro radile a sada više ne, odnosno napiši kada su tačno zatvorene. Ništa ne škodi da tu ima i malo ekonomske istorije. :) PANONIAN (talk) 23:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jews in Serbia - more material on Vojvodina?[edit]

Greetings, Alex!
I've recently started watching this page, and would like to encourage you to add any further material you may have -- and also, if you've no objection, to create a User page (or redirect User:Alexzr88 to another, active one?) to give some indication of your language proficiencies. If you write in non-native English, I'd be glad to copyedit for you. -- Cheers, Deborahjay 10:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografije[edit]

"Da li možda znaš na koji način mogu da stavim copyright na fotografije koje sam ja napravio?"

Koliko sam shvatio, ti hoćeš da zaštitiš svoja autorska prava? Stvarno ne znam kako to da uradiš jer se slabo razumem u copyright - znam kako da na fotografiji napišeš da ona ne podleže autorskim pravima, ali kako da zaštitiš svoja autorska prava to ne znam. Moraš pitati nekog ko se bolje razume u to. PANONIAN (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probaj da pitaš Braneta Jovanovića sa srpske viki. Mislim da se on dosta razume u to. PANONIAN (talk) 03:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Babel boxes[edit]

Alexzr88, this is my tardy response to your mid-February request for help placing Babel boxes on your User page to indicate your languages and their respective proficiency levels. Evidently you've managed just fine meanwhile (and I do hope you noted my "User is busy" banner atop my own User page). Congrats, and keep up the good work! -- Deborahjay 02:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

aradac[edit]

zdravo jeli bi mogao da ubacis i sliku slovacke crkve na ovaj site http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aradac ? --62.177.86.71 23:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Што бре не испребацујеш чланке о Зрењанину на српску википедију. --Vojvodaen (talk) 11:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Пре свега о грађевинама али и о свему осталом што има. --Vojvodaen (talk) 18:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Novi (stari) grb Zrenjanina.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Novi (stari) grb Zrenjanina.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:DSC 7336.jpg[edit]

Image:DSC 7336.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:IIconostatus of the Saint George's Catedral of Novi Sad.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:IIconostatus of the Saint George's Catedral of Novi Sad.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:57, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sinagoga u Kikindi.JPG[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sinagoga u Kikindi.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:D1000035.JPG[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:D1000035.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 20:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pupin stamp2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Pupin stamp2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 18:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM2209.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:HPIM2209.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 06:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPIM2282.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:HPIM2282.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 06:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HPIM1464.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:HPIM1464.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tadija^speaks 11:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:D1000003.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:D1000003.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Subotica.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Subotica.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bukovac palace.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bukovac palace.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.zrenjaninheritage.com/archives/1305. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zrenjanin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zrenjanin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thehoboclown (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of mayors of Zrenjanin[edit]

Da budem iskren, nisam bio siguran kako bi izgledalo da navodim Zrikipediju kao izvor, pa sam to izostavio. Naravno, ako smatrate drugacije, slobodno stavite taj navod, nemam nista protiv. --Sundostund (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Aradac, Serbian Orthodox Church.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Veliki Beckerek - Deo Begeja.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Veliki Beckerek - Deo Begeja.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Bay[edit]

Tagging this article per WP:CSD#G1 was absurd on its face. I don't know if you've done other tagging, but I suggest you gain significantly more experience and judgment before you do so again.--Bbb23 (talk) 06:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Alexzr88. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alexzr88. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Map of Serbia showing Zrenjanin.jpg[edit]

The file File:Map of Serbia showing Zrenjanin.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alexzr88. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Alexzr88. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Veličković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State Road 29 (Serbia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duga Poljana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Obala Begeja i sinagoga.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Obala Begeja i sinagoga.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]