User talk:Alpertunga5000

Before the inevitable blind revert

Get rid of your "popularly" OR based on Google search results from Azerbaijan (Iran). I'm telling you this because I don't want to revert all of your work, but you have some OR in there that should not be there. Thanks. The Behnam 04:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. The other editors may still blindly revert your revisions but at least they don't have an easy excuse now. The Behnam 04:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[1] is precisely what I figured would happen. It is disappointing that they blindly remove everything. The only part that stuck out at my glance was that unsourced bit about the Caucasian ancestry, but I don't understand why these people remove all of the edits. It is like they aren't even willing to consider your additions at all. It is disappointing. The Behnam 04:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The Caucasian ancestry is implicitly proven by the article itself, as well as other articles, when talking about Manna (and Urartu), as well as the fact that Indo-Europeans, and specifically Persians, themselves were not native to the region and came later -- depending on the article, 17th or 6th century BC. Since they were not native, obviously the point that everyone in the region was Iranic is wrong. --adil 05:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked again

For breaching the 1RR parole on Orontid Dynasty, and continuing slow revert wars on multiple other articles, I have blocked you for another week. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

This won't be necessary, I am leaving. Best, --adil 16:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Leaving

I see by your above comment you have decided to stop editing Wikipedia. I hope you will reconsider. Regards, KazakhPol 22:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan

The arbitration case involving you has closed. The Arbitration Committee has banned you from editing Wikipedia for a year. You may see the full decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 01:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked: Your account has been blocked for one year to implement the ban. Editing with sockpuppets is prohibited and will cause the ban length to be reset. Thank you. Thatcher131 01:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ehud Lesar

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The indefinite block on Ehud Lesar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is hereby reversed as it has not been demonstrated that he is a sockpuppet of AdilBaguirov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Necessary actions will be performed by an arbitrator. The sockpuppetry accusations are found to have been made in good faith. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 22:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)