User talk:Amara-Amaziɣ

Berbers

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Berbers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. BrainlarvAmazigh (talk) 17:30, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Plus, you wrote "And where did you see Gadaffi? There is no Gaddafi here!" if you really want to contribute you would see this: | image21 = Muammar Gaddafi, 1973.jpg| caption21 = Gaddafi. As a Berber, I would not be happy someone like Gaddafi to be part of our page/article. (Someone who persecuted our people)

Also, you would see the following sourced materials: |region1 = Morocco | pop1 = ≈40% (12–13 million) |region2 = Algeria | pop2 = ≈25% (7–8 million) |region3 = France | pop3 = over 2,000,000 (1 million Kabyles ) |region9 = Canada | pop9 = 25,885

Removing all these sourced materials is comprising unnecessary destructive action or possibly even intentional vandalism.

Also, why you want to remove the list of our Berber languages, are you ashamed of them?

I hope you did not do it intentionally and will continue to contribute in the positive direction. BrainlarvAmazigh (talk) 17:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Berber languages has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Berber languages was changed by Amara-Amaziɣ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956311 on 2015-10-25T19:29:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Hassania Agadir.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to Tamanrasset

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tamanrasset, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@M.Bitton: Hi sir. No it was absolutely not an original research. I'll fix that by adding references. Amara-Amaziɣ (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

You need to take it to the talk page where you'll have the chance to explain why you deleted the Arabic name. M.Bitton (talk) 00:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Malika Mezzane moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Malika Mezzane, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae All right. Thank you. Amara-Amaziɣ (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malika Mezzane has been accepted

Malika Mezzane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lajmmoore (talk) 08:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello! Thanks for working on the Malika Mezzane article. I made a couple of improvements and accepted it. I do have a few questions and suggestions for ways you could further improve it:

• Join WP:WikiProject Women in Red - we focus on adding biographies of women and have a helpful community of editors. Please say hello our our Talk page.
• Images: I don't think the image you've added will be able to stay, unless it's a photography you took yourself? Wikipedia is strict on copyright, and the entry on Commons says the author is Mezzane and its from her blog. Unless you took the image yourself, you can't add it to Commons. Just because an image is online doesn't mean it can be used on Wikipedia.
• I added some headings - they help break the text up and provide structure for the reader.
• References - it would be great if you could add the citations for the poetic works you've added.
• Date of birth - you need to add a reference to where you got that infomation from.
• In the text I've added a couple of pointers where the text could do with greater precision or a reference. Hope that is helpful.
• There's also some additional references which would be great to add here & this

Looking forward to seeing future edits, feel free to get in touch via my Talk page Lajmmoore (talk) 09:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)