User talk:Amaury/2018/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Maya Le Clark
I noticed your tagging the article for speedy deletion (A7) and also making mention about it in reverting an IP at The Thundermans (who wikilinked her name). That IP also went and removed the speedy delete tag by trying to add relatively little more to the article, which I reverted, but then I noticed in the history that it was previously a redirect to The Thundermans ... and I decided to restore it to a redirect. MPFitz1968 (talk) 10:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- @MPFitz1968: Thanks. I failed to notice that myself as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 10:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Star Falls
Hey, unfortunately, it looks like somebody already created a redirect at Star Falls. That creates complications when your Draft is ready to go to Mainspace – it means we're either going to need Admin assistance to delete the redirect and move your Draft in its place, or we're going to need Admin assistance to do a WP:Histmerge, or I will have to do some Page mover magic and move the redirect out of the way... In this particular case, options #1 or #2 are probably the advisable way to go. Option #1 will probably require making a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Uncontroversial technical requests – if you go that route, just make it clear that your Draft was created before the redirect was in your move request... FWIW. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
In thinking it over, it might be better if I made the request at WP:RM rather than you... We can discuss this, when your Draft gets more fleshed out as we get closer to the series' ultimate premiere. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:19, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Do what you think is best.
You'll remember a similar thing happened with Hunter Street, which the user made wrong to begin with. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Related discussion: Mako: Island of Secrets from December 2017
Not much to say, but I'm late to the party as it's already been archived. I've watched both H2O and Mako, and now I've re-added both of them to my watchlist as I hadn't done that yet. Though it's not like I missed out on much because I haven't really been active here lately, but I'll try to be more active. And yeah, I agree with the character list thing as usual. nyuszika7h (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Returns Feb. 11, as per [1]. Just thought you should know... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: I didn't even know it was renewed. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Return dates for Famous in Love (and The Bold Type, which you probably don't care about...): [2] --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Confirmation for Sofia Carson on Famous in Love (etc.): [3] But unclear if this will be "main" or "recurring" cast of a "one-off" guest appearance... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Followup: I've posted about this to Talk:Famous in Love. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
IPs 190.105.29.98 and 72.49.240.83
Just a comment: I can't help but notice the similar editing WP:POINTs of Special:Contributions/190.105.29.98 and Special:Contributions/72.49.240.83. It turns out they geolocate to totally different countries, so it's probably just a coincidence. Still, I just think this is something to keep an eye on... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Still have the disruptive IP on ratings sig fig's at this article – care to revert this time? As they refuse to discuss, I'm disinclined to roll over on this... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- @IJBall: There is no discussion needed, the figures in the source should be entered as is in the article. Rounding misrepresents and invalidates the source. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 05:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- and you didn't start any discussion on the talk page. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 05:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- The onus is on you, not us. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- You reverted first. You should have started the talk about your invalidation of the source with a Zap2It broadcast style rounding of the figures. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 05:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's not how it works. See WP:BRD. You edited, but were then reverted. It was then up to you to take it to the talk page which you have failed to do. Nothing is invalidated. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- No I restored it to the quoted source, you reverted it back the editor's own version that looks like they are from a Zap2It broadcast ratings source, which they are not. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 06:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Go and troll elsewhere. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- What happened to your so-called talk??? And stop trolling articles with your unfounded and vandal reverts. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 06:30, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Go and troll elsewhere. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- No I restored it to the quoted source, you reverted it back the editor's own version that looks like they are from a Zap2It broadcast ratings source, which they are not. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 06:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's not how it works. See WP:BRD. You edited, but were then reverted. It was then up to you to take it to the talk page which you have failed to do. Nothing is invalidated. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- You reverted first. You should have started the talk about your invalidation of the source with a Zap2It broadcast style rounding of the figures. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 05:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- The onus is on you, not us. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)