User talk:Aminnie

Aminnie, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Aminnie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Movaghar (October 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

remove red links and that it's from another wiki

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Movaghar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jalal Movaghar) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Jalal Movaghar, Aminnie!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The notability of this politician has been questioned, but I think this is mainly because the article has so little information and there is no link to an article on him in another Wikipedia (e.g. Persian). Mayors aren't automatically notable, but if he was mayor of the whole province, he would probably meet WP:GNG. Are you able to add anything to the article at all, to justify me removing the notability tag? Thanks again for creating it.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on Movaghar family members[edit]

Hello, User talk:Aminnie. I saw your recently created article simple:Khodadad Movaghar and others on the Movaghar family. Now I'm joining other editors to emphasize that articles without content and references (sources where the information has been published) will be deleted - also in the Simple English Wikipedia. See my recent changes to Khodadad Movaghar as examples of how these pages can be improved. You can study other pages as examples, e.g. in Category:Iranian translators. After you add content with references, other editors can help correct the English and Wikipedia style (format). Be sure to visit the Wikipedia Teahouse to discuss any difficulties you may have. -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 13:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 14:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aminnie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise to DO NOT disturbe anymore

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Aminnie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19694 was submitted on Nov 06, 2017 15:49:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblocked my accompte[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aminnie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead. Aminnie (talk) 08:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have closely copied the wording from the previous unblock refusal, but have not mentioned the reason for your block, which is the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.